Always awkward when the official account for a movie follows you on social media, faves and retweets all your posts about the festival, gets a lot of buzz from very enthusiastic programmers, and then you show up and just don't like the movie much at all. Figure I'll get an unfollow for it.
Not from Ms. Apocalypse writer/director Lim Sun-ae, though, there for her second day and had a pretty good film with her. One issue that was brought up was that there isn't a whole lot of representation for the disabled in Korean film (see also: everywhere), although one thing that I found kind of interesting was that I don't think Cho Yu-jin's affliction was ever actually named in the film, although Lim did specify muscular dystrophy in the Q&A. Interesting choice, that; I wonder if it was just a case of not wanting her to explain her condition when there are other, less sympathetic but more individual parts of her personality to highlight, or if it gave the filmmakers a little wiggle room with diagnoses.
I skipped a slot in the middle of the afternoon to get some fish & chips at McKibbins, amused by how, despite their being the official pub of the festival at least since The Irish Embassy burned down and my seeing their same promo before films at least 300 times, conservatively, I had never stepped foot in the place. I may not do so again, as I'm not a drinker and the food was just fne, but I can at least cross it off the list.
(I was kind of surprised to see another location, apparently larger, near the hotel/dorm where I was staying; I'd assumed it was a neighborhood business and now, like, did they expand from the one near Concordia to the one near UQÃM or vice versa, or is this a place that has locations all over Canada/Québec/Montréal and I just thought it was local? That sort of thing can throw you!)
The thing I skipped was A Disturbance in the Force, the documentary about the Star Wars Holiday Special; I've seen too many fandom-oriented documentaries at Boston Sci-Fi and music docs at IFFBoston that were fine but not really interesting, esecially if the subject matter doesn't, and I can't say this thing held any fascination for me, no matter how much I enjoy Star Wars. So I sat down to eat and ran some errands to make sure I had breakfast stuff on-hand at the hotel room instead. My friend Paul, who programs a theater in upstate New York, saw it and shrugged, saying it wasn't great, but he figured he could sell some tickets, although he was kid of surprised that the screening wasn't better-attended, but it's a different world than when we were younger - where once folks may have sought this out from vague memories and the desire to have even a little more material, there is now so much Star Wars that you have to choose what to care about, and the Holiday Special can properly be regarded as a memory-holed dead end.
No guests for the next movie, because it was a last-minute substitution - My Worst Neighbor was, for one reason or another, no longer able to play the festival, so another Korean film, New Normal played in its place (there were noteworthy sponsors for the Korean film series this year, so there are likely reasons for not just treating it as a free slot). This was fine by me; I hadn't been able to fit it in earlier in the week and it looked to have roughly the same vibe. Made for a relatively small crowd in Hall, though, as I figure most folks who wanted to see it had six days earlier.
(The online program shows a short, "Uberlinks", as playing with the film, but my notes have no record of it; maybe it only played with the first screening.)
Director Tsutomu Hanabusa and prodcuer Naohito Inaba (second and third from left) were there for Tokyo Revengers 2 - Part 1, and as you might expect, there wasn't necessarily that much to say afterward, what with Part 2 scheduled for the next night.
Finally, Mitch Davis and Viktor Kinzburg toalking about EMPIRE V, which fills out that big Russia-shaped space on one's Letterboxd map nicely, and which had gotten a hard,enthusiastic push from Mitch in particular and certainly worked to attract some attention, especially with talk about how it had been banned for being too enthusiastic about taking on the oligarchs, but, man, you could feel Mitch's boundless enthusiasm clash with the reality of just how tough a slog this movie can be. One can absolutely see where a programmer's enthusiasm would develop - when watching the screener on a small screen, you would absolutely want to see some of it blown up to the size of a small building, and it's certainly got more ideas up its sleeve than the average blockbuster, but it can be dull to the point of sapping more life than its vampiric characters.
Which does not, oddly enough, make for a bad Q&A! Mitch's enthusiasm was still there after the film, and it is sufficiently strange that Kinzburg couldn't help but have interesting stories, starting with actually having a grant from the cultural ministry that got yanked(*) to and having to make up the rest with crowdfunding and other investors. They also wound up doing some guerrilla-style filmmaking in that they got drone shots in places where even much less paranoid cities than Moscow would prefer you not fly drones; if you want aerial footage of the Kremlin and Red Square, you just have to factor losing a few octocopters into your budget. One of the signals to Russian viewers that these vampire oligarchs have incredible power was apparently that they regularly drove in special lanes meant to be reserved for the military, and, no they did not get permission to do this. More prosaically, the film needed poetry at its climax, and though the source novel was written by a famous poet, he made a show of not wanting to interfere with Kinzburg's vision… and then sent verses in at the last minute.
(*) This was actually a pretty important issue for the festival; during the introduction Mitch noted that they said no to several Russian films, some I believe from folks who had previously had work in the festival, because they had received government funding and they could not, in good conscience, be responsible for money going back to the Russian government.
An interesting day, all around. Next up: A Sunday featuring Motherland, The Concierge, Tokyo Revengers 2 - Part 2, and Late Night with the Devil.
Segimalui Sarang (Ms. Apocalypse, aka Love at the End of the World
* * * (out of four)
Seen 29 July 2023 in Salle J.A. De Sève (Fantasia Festival, DCP)
Lim Seon-ae's Ms. Apocalypse winds up being quite a nice film about people who find themselves taken advantage of, either because it's their nature or a means of survival, stopping short of being cynical but remaining quite clear-eyed In some ways, the vibe is that of a found-family story where everyone is painfully aware of just how fragile and conditional those sorts of bonds can be bonds can be.
Consider Kim Young-mi (Lee You-young) as she is in the late 1990s, a bookkeeper at a local factory who werks apart from the rest in an unheated office, while her home life has her effectively the sole caretaker of an aunt suffering from dementia, with cousin Kyu-tae no help. About the only person who seems to see her is co-worker Koo Do-yeong (Roh Jae-won), to the point where she cooks the books to temporarily cover for his shortfalls, which eventually lands them both in jail. Young-mi is released first, in 1999, and the only people meeting her at the jail are Koo's wife Cho Yu-jin (Lim Sun-woo) and her hairdresser/driver Jun. Her aunt's house gone and Kyu-tae nowhere to be found, house demolished and Kyu-tae nowhere to be found, Young-mi winds up moving in with Yu-jin, who may be thoroughly unpleasant but has a spare room and, given her severe neuromuscular disorder, probably needs live-in help.
Yu-jin is, at one point, described as having a terrible personality while being a reasonable person, and there's something interesting about that because it's often a bit of freedom that being disabled takes from a person. The film seldom sets them up in direct opposition to each other, or has them in the same frame, but it's worth noting that Kyu-tae is, more or less, able to get away with being a selfish, unreasonable person, even if the audience despises him, but Yu-jin has to have some sort of heart of gold underneath it all, even if she's got far more reason to be angry at the world than he does, because otherwise the home-care people will refuse to come or they'll feel free to steal, and she's got to hold her tongue even though the world has already kicked her around but good.
Lim Sun-woo takes that part and runs with it, knowing Yu-jin cannot back down until confronted directly, but she and director Lim have a very good sense of where the line is between her harsh words for those around her being darkly comic and it being kind of pathetic, making the moments when she steps over mean something. It's a flashy performance that often outshines that of Lee Yoo-young as Young-mi, by design, but in some ways, that makes Young-mi's efforts to find the happy medium between the people-pleasing nature that has allowed people to walk all over her and the desire to lash out all the more interesting to watch. Lee captures how she knows she wants to be stronger but doesn't necessarily want to be like this without looking indecisive or excessively blank.
One thing that's interesting here is that the filmmakers seem quite conscious of how the characters are using bright colors and style to deflect, but it's very present here without quite becoming tacky. Yes, there's something obvious going on where Young-mi's world is black & white before her arrest and in color afterward, as she's introduced to Yu-jin, Jun, and their bolder personalities, but Lim gets the audience to look closer. Even the new red dye job Young-mi gets early on looks almost instantly faded, and there are other signals that the idea is to remind a viewer of movies with colorful and bright production design where characters can unveil new versions of themselves that reflect what vibrant people they are underneath while also saying that it doesn't exactly work that way. Yu-jin is always making sure she is immaculately turned out, but the audience sees her doing it, and it represents not as much her being strong as her desperate to project strength.
Which doesn't make the movie a downer. It's realistic but doesn't look at its helpful main character as a sap for her good nature, even when she's taken advantage of. In the end, she's still a bookkeeper, but she's maybe learned that keeping the books balanced means being fair to yourself.
New Normal
* * ¾ (out of four)
Seen 29 July 2023 in Auditorium des diplômés de la SGWU (Théâtre Hall) (Fantasia Festival, DCP)
Intersecting-story movies like, say, Pulp Fiction, can sometimes be fascinating for how various threads come together, or how shifting perspectives helps reassess each one, but that's a best-case scenario. Often, it kind of feels like someone emptying out a notebook of ideas that didn't necessarily work elsewhere and tying them together as best they could to mixed results, because the connections do not necessarily strengthen them so much as justify them being features rather than shorts.
In the first of six stories from writer/director Jung Beom-sik, "M", Hung-jun (Choi Ji-woo) must put her guard up when a man knocks on her door, saying he is there to inspect her fire alarms despite it being an odd hour and no email from the building management, while the second, "Do the Right Thing", has high school slacker Seung-jin (Jung Dong-won) finds helping an elderly lady get her groceries home much more involved than the minor good deed he thought it would be; third "Dressed to Kill" has Hyun-su (Lee Yu-mi) on a terrible blind date, only to see another girl in the restaurant wearing a similar outfit become the latest victim of a serial killer. They are, individually, solid enough short films, and the connecting threads that start to appear are fun, although this stretch of the movie does tend to run into the issue where, if every entry in an anthology takes a dark turn, the amount of surprise and suspense can start to wane. There's fun to be had here; "M" is a tight little one-location thriller and Choi Ji-woo is great in it, apparently returning from a bit of a hiatus, and if Jung Dong-won feels a bit off in "Do the Right Thing", it's got a fine comic premise, as does "Dressed to Kill", although the latter winds up functioning more as a nexus of the other stories than being able to focus on its own premise.
After that, "Be With You" sees Yoo-hoon (Choi Min-ho) receive instructions from vending machines leading him to what he hopes is the girl of his dreams; while "Peeping Tom" has Gee-jin (P.O.), an obsessed creep, sneaking into the apartment of his sexy flight attendant neighbor (Hwang Seung-eon?) only to discover he may not be alone. "Be With You" might be the most purely pleasurable segment of the film, as the previous three create expectations that Choi Min-Ho's character seems to be blithely ignoring, and he sets up an entertaining, linear tale that moves quick and benefits from that tension without seeming trapped by it. "Peeping Tom" isn't quite so cheerful; P.O. is playing a perv and filmmaker Jung doesn't quite find the angle that has the audience with him as the twists happen, or even to make the reversals seem clever rather than something to be shrugged off.
The last piece, "My Life as a Dog", has convenience store clerk Yeon-jin (Ha Da-in) - who really thought she'd be playing rock gigs by now - blow off steam online (she'd previously been glimpsed taunting Gee-jin) and find that some folks asking how to dispose of bodies on Reddit maybe aren't just pretending. Yeon-jin is probably the most fully-realized protagonist of the film, and that happens in part because Jung spends a little time hanging back, watching her steadily lose her patience with the rude group she must deal with in the job before a long bike ride to the suburbs, allowing the audience to get to know her and sort of feel how life can grind people down in mundane ways, with Ha Da-in doing quite well to grab the audience's favor despite all of that.
There's the germ of a pretty good idea in each of these segments, and in most cases Jung attacks it, ready to squeeze the most out of it, and by and large he meets the challenges he sets for himself. The fourth and fifth segments are the most darkly funny, in the way that they really lead to nasty punchlines, and the interconnectedness of it is often fun, because once it's established that all these stories are happening at once, having an eye out for easter eggs or convergences Jung edits on top of writing and directing, and for being a film that stops and restarts a few times, it moves forward very well indeed.
There's a certain nihilism to these interconnected murder stories, even beyond the "always expect the worst" factor, that keeps the movie from having a real climax and gut punch as a whole; Jung arguably highlights digital acquaintanceship and matchmaking alongside his transgressions, but doesn't necessarily have much to say about them or any possible connection. For a much fun as the soundtrack's utter lack of subtlety is, you can't use some of the tracks dropped in without earning comparison to the movie they're lifted from, and the same goes with the chapter titles: Your serial killer story should be a bit better than this to be called "M", for instance.
Many movies can be unsatisfying in spots but still worth recommending because pieces are good, and that's obviously more true with something like New Normal. Some segments are terrific, and some elements of others are able to be seen clearly enough to pop. As a whole, it maybe doesn't entirely come together, but those good bits are really good.
Tokyo Revengers 2: Bloody Halloween - Destiny
* * ½ (out of four)
Seen 29 July 2023 in Auditorium des diplômés de la SGWU (Théâtre Hall) (Fantasia Festival, DCP)
Yep, this is very much half a movie, the sort that has me taking lots of notes of character names and motivations for when I write this review (or watch part 2), but not a whole lot of "wow, that was cool, make sure to mention that". With each half of this movie being right around ninety minutes, I strongly suspect that there's a good epic-size picture to be found in the story if the studios didn't figure they could sell two tickets instead of one. It is also full of actors who are just not plausibly 17 during the time travel to 10 years ago, let alone 15 in the flashbacks.
After the events of Tokyo Revengers, Takemichi "Michi" Hanagaki (Takumi Kitamura) has prevented the murder of Hinata Tachibana (Mio Imada) in the past, only to see her murdered once again, this time in the present, apparently on the behest of Tetta Kisaki (Shotaro Mamiya), who intends to destroy everyone Majiro "Mikey" Sano (Ryo Yoshizawa) held dear. The seeds for all of this were planted fifteen years ago, when the Toman gang was founded, but Hinata's brother Naoto (Yosuke Sugino) can only send Michi back ten years, but that appears to be a critical time, with Mikey's best friend and co-founder of Toman Baji Keisuke (Kento Nagayama) being released from jail but splitting with Mikey, while Kisaki has recently joined Toman after having been a member of the defeated Moebius gang. Michi vaguely knows there's a brawl coming, but ten years ago, he was little more than a hanger-on and mascot - he'll have to rise in the ranks quickly if he stands any chance of preventing "Bloody Halloween".
Though I grumble about this sort of split seeming to be designed to sell more tickets, there's logic to it; subsequent books (or, in this case, manga storylines) tend to be longer than their predecessors but the "right" length for a movie is more constrained than that of other media, so a split may be the only way to preserve the pacing of the first successful adaptation while maintaining the same level of fidelity to the source. You can see that being the case here, with a lot that needs to happen leading up to Bloody Halloween and flashbacks even further back to flesh it out. The film is pretty enjoyable on those terms, though - it throws new mysteries at the audience pretty much constantly while offsetting it with useful background information, and punctuates the melodrama of these youth-gang vendettas with brutal beatdowns.
As before, the film has an appealingly earnest dope at the center, although Takumi Kitamura gets stuck in a rough spot there - as much as Michi is the protagonist, the story is really not about him in any way: The character is not bright enough to really solve this mystery (and can only occasionally consult with the brains of the operation), and even the thin story about a loser revisiting his high school peak is even less of a factor here. He's highly watchable, though, and Kento Nagayama is a great addition to the cast as the bombastic Baji. Ryo Yoshizawa is a fine combination of bluster and fragility, and Shotaro Mamiya solidifies his position as the series's villain.
This movie ultimately lands right on the border of the split seeming like a good idea and it perhaps being wiser to make one movie, but ends on a cliffhanger good enough to make me glad the festival had part 2 the next night.
Ampir V (Empire V)
* * (out of four)
Seen 29 July 2023 in Auditorium des diplômés de la SGWU (Théâtre Hall) (Fantasia Festival, digital)
So much world-building and exposition and philosophy, so little actually doing anything. Empire V is the sort of film that looks like it should be exciting, a combination of weird horror melodrama and satirical humor elevated by striking visuals, but can't quite manage it. Its secret rulers of the world never seem to do much ruling the world, and no amount of detail makes their internal squabbles more interesting.
It starts by introducing slacker Muscovite Roman (Pavel Tabakov), who certainly gives the impression of being vampire food, but is instead recruited by vampire Brama (Vladimir Epifantsev), the current avatar of Rama to receive his "tongue" and take his position. He naturally catches the eye of another recent convert, Hera (Taya Radchenko), especially as they are trained in their new abilities and positions by instructor Loki (Bronislav Vinogrodkiy). Rama has a rival for Hera in her master Mithra (Miron Federov), and he's a formidable one, likely behind the deteriorating condition that led Brama to pass his tongue on.
The aim is apparently to take aim at the oligarchs who have outsized power in society, especially in the film's home territory of Russia, portraying them as vampires draining society. Writer/director Victor Ginzburg (working from a novel by Viktor Pelevin) carefully emphasizes that these creatures don't subsist entirely on blood, but actually prefer a "milk" that is distilled from money. It's here that one can feel Ginzburg getting particularly caught in the weeds, especially as the wise old vampires start musing that money is just an idea that people made up and yet it is so powerful that… Well, they go on, and the strangeness of how this is actually implemented does not make it resonate more. Perhaps what it does of that is full of references that Russian audiences will understand immediately, but it can be opaque to other audiences.
Instead, it becomes a sort of romance between two characters that don't have much to them. Rama and Hera are given very little specific background and for most of the movie, Pavel Tabakov and Taya Radchenko are kind of capably bland - never so completely unreactive as to feel wooden but also never finding a hook that suggests there's more going on than them being reasonably good-looking people of a similar age. There's maybe an angle about addiction, but aside from Roman's mother calling him one, there's not much indication; he feels aimless more as opposed to being someone searching for the next high, at least until the movie introduces the milk and makes it sound so impossibly addictive that no human could resist it (and, credit where it's due, Tabakov and Radchenko sell the idea that introducing people who had been addicts as humans to this stuff is probably a Bad Idea). As a result, this story winds up being more about dynasties collapsing through decadence than oligarchs being entrenched. That it's not what the movie was sold as is no big deal, but the way it comes about is not worth the amount of detailed set-up.
It's very fun to look at, though, with imaginative production design, effects shots where I immediately knew what the credits for "fractal art" meant, and the sort of willingness to go big that can paper over some less than photo-real visual effects. Empire V is, at its best moments, deeply weird, offering up more convolutions and creature effects than it comes close to needing and making it all work because Ginzburg puts it all up on screen or has characters drop long tracts of exposition with utter confidence. That's not always enough - he'll keep explaining even when the audience has absorbed what they need to know and enough ancillary details to give it flavor, or he'll serve up a poetry slam when a viewer might be expecting a fight (though maybe it's a great poetry slam for those who speak Russian; the subtitles are just okay).
That is how you make an epic fantasy into a slog: Ginzburg introduces a grand, swooping setting filled with eccentric style and boils it to as bland and small a story as possible.
Showing posts with label satire. Show all posts
Showing posts with label satire. Show all posts
Wednesday, October 04, 2023
Monday, March 28, 2022
Short Stuff: The 2021 Oscar-Nominated Live-Action Shorts
Still playing a couple shows at the Coolidge this week and one more time at the ICA on Sunday, so this isn't a totally irrelevant post after the ceremony!
Anyway, we've got a really solid group this year, so let's get right to it:
"On My Mind"
* * * ¾ (out of four)
Seen 19 March 2022 in the Coolidge Corner Theatre GoldScreen (Oscar Shorts, digital)
If Martin Strange-Hansen's "On My Mind" has any issues, it's that he seemingly feels some need to inject more tension and conflict than is really necessary. The story has barmaid Louise (Camilla Bendix) happy to serve a drink and fire up the karaoke machine when Henrik (Rasmus Hammerich) comes in after closing time, with owner Preben (Ole Boisen) choosing to be fussy about such things. The audience, of course, has already had a glimpse of why Henrik needs something to settle himself down, but they're likely going to go along with Louise and empathize with the man anyway. It's not that Preben is hard to believe - many have encountered folks who easily default to not really being able to see more than an inch beyond their own nose - but he winds up feeling transparently like a means to keep the short running in place more than anything else.
It's a great little piece around that, though; Hammerich and Bendix do really excellent work sketching out who these people are without Strange-Hansen having to feed the audience more information than they really need, and this has at its heart one of film's great karaoke scenes, even if it's unconventional: Even if the activity seems tremendously unappealing (as it does to me), the filmmakers still get across just how important escaping into that sort of performance can be, expressing oneself in part by changing context.
(Though I am kind of amused at how the karaoke machine lists "You Were Always on My Mind" as an Elvis Preseley song, since he's well behind Willie Nelson and the Pet Shop Boys in terms of who I associate the song with. Probably in fourth after Hammerich now!)
"Please Hold"
* * * ½ (out of four)
Seen 19 March 2022 in the Coolidge Corner Theatre GoldScreen (Oscar Shorts, digital)
This played one of the virtual Fantasia Fests? Huh, I feel like I would have seen it, in that case, but I don't remember it. Odd, because I like it a lot. It's targeted absurdity that recognizes that its audience is not exactly living in a subtle world, so there is no particular need for satire to be subtle. Every point it makes about the American prison-industrial complex feels bang-on, ripped from a story disturbingly hidden on page B18 Law & Order-style. Co-writer/director KD Davila knows his target and homes in on them.
It works, both as a short film and as a story, in large part because lead Erick Lopez makes unjustly-targeted Mateo such an amiable, likable protagonist; he's an easy guy to spend twenty minutes with and is able to rail against his twisted situation in such a way that the audience doesn't find him off-putting, and Davila recognizes how so much of this happens because so many good people want to believe the system is built to be fair and just needs a bit more earnest effort when it isn't. Amid all the very obvious exaggerations of real-world injustices, this unstated idea at the center quietly seeps into everything.
I'm not sure when this was made, but if it's a pandemic-shot production, it's one of the ones that made especially good adaptations. Where so many shorts shot in 2020 or 2021 make the use of screens and empty streets into something that needs to be explained and worked around, this feels like something built around those requirements but not about why they exist in the real world., and as a result has a sense of authenticity even though it doesn't actually redress things outside of its main set that much.
"Sukienka" ("The Dress")
* * * (out of four)
Seen 19 March 2022 in the Coolidge Corner Theatre GoldScreen (Oscar Shorts, digital)
Tadeusz Lysiak's "The Dress" isn't actually about a dress, but it's a clear and clever way to distill the limbo Julka (Anna Dzieduszycka) often finds herself in - someone of her short stature and proportions can often find casual clothing in the children's section, but something sexy needs to be custom-ordered or tailor-made, making her feel less like a woman and not really sure what to do when one of the truckers (Szymon Piotr Warszawski) who stops at the motel where she lives and works as a maid actually shows some interest.
Dzieduszycka delivers a genuinely impressive show of frustration that has been going on so long that she's just come to treat it as her life's baseline, the thing that makes it hard for her to get along with even the people like co-worker Renata (Dorota Pomykala) who are at the point of taking her height in stride, mixing it up with general working-class frustration. There's an untidy, transitory feel to even the more permanent parts of the setting, underscoring the limbo where Julka keeps herself, maybe right down to how everybody she meets tends to give her a different nickname.
That the search for a dress is not a quest but just a thing that that hovers over this upcoming date makes the short a little shaggier, but that seems fair and honest. Julka has given up on quick fixes or one thing turning her life around, but that doesn't mean solving that sort of problem won't help.
"The Long Goodbye"
* * * (out of four)
Seen 19 March 2022 in the Coolidge Corner Theatre GoldScreen (Oscar Shorts, digital)
How speculative is "The Long Goodbye" meant to be? Aneil Karia's short feels like the kind of thing that could either be based on a real-life incident or a warning about how things like this aren't far off, and that's perhaps part of the point - dire warnings and horrific events overlap in time, which maybe plays into the ways that this film gets even more peculiar as it keeps going past when most would fade to black.
That's the second big tonal shift; after what looks like a household of Middle-Eastern descent apparently preparing for a wedding suddenly finds themselves pulled out by black-clad men with guns, who may be government or may not be. The wedding prep had been a little tense in the way such things are - a lot to do in a little time, and the TVs in the background broadcasting ominous stories - but this is something else altogether, although it's a pretty nifty job of showing how people just trying to live a life with the constant hum of such things in the background can suddenly find it interrupting into real terror.
And then… Well, the short gets weird. One of the most prominent characters is played by Riz Ahmed (credited as "co-creator"), who stands afterward and does a spoken-word/rap piece, and it's an odd bit, making what had previously been subtext text, not exactly logical given what had previously happened. It's nicely-done, if a thoroughly theatrical thing to cap a short that had previously been naturalistically performed and grounded. It'll throw some, but then, it's not exactly a short looking to make its point subtly.
"Ala Kachuu - Take and Run"
* * * ¾ (out of four)
Seen 19 March 2022 in the Coolidge Corner Theatre GoldScreen (Oscar Shorts, digital)
"Ala Kachuu - Take and Run" is built on hammering things home as well, but then, that's sort of the point: Sezim (Alina Turdumamatova) is a bright young woman who dreams of going to University but has to practically run away to do it, only to find herself kidnapped into marriage, and it's not even an arranged one - she was just convenient. Husband Dayrbek (Nurbek Esengazy Uulu) seems decent, as such men go, but Sezim has no intention of becoming one of the women her mother's age who eventually accepts this as the way things are.
Writer/director Maria Brendle does excellent work keeping her eye on a certain line, where the film isn't just showing the cruelty and sexism of the culture in this part of Kyrgyzstan or how Sezim suffers, but isn't lecturing about how, as much as the men who kidnap force themselves upon their "wives", it is the women who eventually accept it that allow this system to be perpetuated. Granted, the audience is going to want Sezim to spell it out - she and friend Aksana (Madina Talipbekova) and kid sister Aygul (Aybike Erkinbekova) are clearly perceptive enough to understand it, but that kind of direct confrontation might keep the viewer from letting how people become complicit to bury their own shame and anger really fester - and, besides, a certain moment works best if someone figures it out herself.
It's also a striking film to watch generally; Brendle and her crew find the beauty in a land that is poor, isolated, and backward in many ways, and do a good job building high-speed escape attempts around someone who is clearly just driving for the first time or two. There's a great moment early on where Sezim and her mother are making bread together, which is apparently a major part or the wedding rituals, and the way that Sezim is just no good at it compared to her - but has still familiar enough to work in a shop later - is a great, quick way to establish her character. Alina Turdumamatova does a nice job of making Sezim feel like an ordinary girl who knows she deserves more rather than someone exceptional enough to break the system.
As I finish writing this, the awards have already been handed out (off-screen, apparently), because I saw them late and have had a busy-ish week. If I'd had a vote, it would have been for "Please Hold", although that was going to be a long shot. I'm not surprised "The Long Goodbye" won - a name as familiar as Riz Ahmed in a short gives it a heck of a boost - and certainly can't gripe about it.
Anyway, we've got a really solid group this year, so let's get right to it:
"On My Mind"
* * * ¾ (out of four)
Seen 19 March 2022 in the Coolidge Corner Theatre GoldScreen (Oscar Shorts, digital)
If Martin Strange-Hansen's "On My Mind" has any issues, it's that he seemingly feels some need to inject more tension and conflict than is really necessary. The story has barmaid Louise (Camilla Bendix) happy to serve a drink and fire up the karaoke machine when Henrik (Rasmus Hammerich) comes in after closing time, with owner Preben (Ole Boisen) choosing to be fussy about such things. The audience, of course, has already had a glimpse of why Henrik needs something to settle himself down, but they're likely going to go along with Louise and empathize with the man anyway. It's not that Preben is hard to believe - many have encountered folks who easily default to not really being able to see more than an inch beyond their own nose - but he winds up feeling transparently like a means to keep the short running in place more than anything else.
It's a great little piece around that, though; Hammerich and Bendix do really excellent work sketching out who these people are without Strange-Hansen having to feed the audience more information than they really need, and this has at its heart one of film's great karaoke scenes, even if it's unconventional: Even if the activity seems tremendously unappealing (as it does to me), the filmmakers still get across just how important escaping into that sort of performance can be, expressing oneself in part by changing context.
(Though I am kind of amused at how the karaoke machine lists "You Were Always on My Mind" as an Elvis Preseley song, since he's well behind Willie Nelson and the Pet Shop Boys in terms of who I associate the song with. Probably in fourth after Hammerich now!)
"Please Hold"
* * * ½ (out of four)
Seen 19 March 2022 in the Coolidge Corner Theatre GoldScreen (Oscar Shorts, digital)
This played one of the virtual Fantasia Fests? Huh, I feel like I would have seen it, in that case, but I don't remember it. Odd, because I like it a lot. It's targeted absurdity that recognizes that its audience is not exactly living in a subtle world, so there is no particular need for satire to be subtle. Every point it makes about the American prison-industrial complex feels bang-on, ripped from a story disturbingly hidden on page B18 Law & Order-style. Co-writer/director KD Davila knows his target and homes in on them.
It works, both as a short film and as a story, in large part because lead Erick Lopez makes unjustly-targeted Mateo such an amiable, likable protagonist; he's an easy guy to spend twenty minutes with and is able to rail against his twisted situation in such a way that the audience doesn't find him off-putting, and Davila recognizes how so much of this happens because so many good people want to believe the system is built to be fair and just needs a bit more earnest effort when it isn't. Amid all the very obvious exaggerations of real-world injustices, this unstated idea at the center quietly seeps into everything.
I'm not sure when this was made, but if it's a pandemic-shot production, it's one of the ones that made especially good adaptations. Where so many shorts shot in 2020 or 2021 make the use of screens and empty streets into something that needs to be explained and worked around, this feels like something built around those requirements but not about why they exist in the real world., and as a result has a sense of authenticity even though it doesn't actually redress things outside of its main set that much.
"Sukienka" ("The Dress")
* * * (out of four)
Seen 19 March 2022 in the Coolidge Corner Theatre GoldScreen (Oscar Shorts, digital)
Tadeusz Lysiak's "The Dress" isn't actually about a dress, but it's a clear and clever way to distill the limbo Julka (Anna Dzieduszycka) often finds herself in - someone of her short stature and proportions can often find casual clothing in the children's section, but something sexy needs to be custom-ordered or tailor-made, making her feel less like a woman and not really sure what to do when one of the truckers (Szymon Piotr Warszawski) who stops at the motel where she lives and works as a maid actually shows some interest.
Dzieduszycka delivers a genuinely impressive show of frustration that has been going on so long that she's just come to treat it as her life's baseline, the thing that makes it hard for her to get along with even the people like co-worker Renata (Dorota Pomykala) who are at the point of taking her height in stride, mixing it up with general working-class frustration. There's an untidy, transitory feel to even the more permanent parts of the setting, underscoring the limbo where Julka keeps herself, maybe right down to how everybody she meets tends to give her a different nickname.
That the search for a dress is not a quest but just a thing that that hovers over this upcoming date makes the short a little shaggier, but that seems fair and honest. Julka has given up on quick fixes or one thing turning her life around, but that doesn't mean solving that sort of problem won't help.
"The Long Goodbye"
* * * (out of four)
Seen 19 March 2022 in the Coolidge Corner Theatre GoldScreen (Oscar Shorts, digital)
How speculative is "The Long Goodbye" meant to be? Aneil Karia's short feels like the kind of thing that could either be based on a real-life incident or a warning about how things like this aren't far off, and that's perhaps part of the point - dire warnings and horrific events overlap in time, which maybe plays into the ways that this film gets even more peculiar as it keeps going past when most would fade to black.
That's the second big tonal shift; after what looks like a household of Middle-Eastern descent apparently preparing for a wedding suddenly finds themselves pulled out by black-clad men with guns, who may be government or may not be. The wedding prep had been a little tense in the way such things are - a lot to do in a little time, and the TVs in the background broadcasting ominous stories - but this is something else altogether, although it's a pretty nifty job of showing how people just trying to live a life with the constant hum of such things in the background can suddenly find it interrupting into real terror.
And then… Well, the short gets weird. One of the most prominent characters is played by Riz Ahmed (credited as "co-creator"), who stands afterward and does a spoken-word/rap piece, and it's an odd bit, making what had previously been subtext text, not exactly logical given what had previously happened. It's nicely-done, if a thoroughly theatrical thing to cap a short that had previously been naturalistically performed and grounded. It'll throw some, but then, it's not exactly a short looking to make its point subtly.
"Ala Kachuu - Take and Run"
* * * ¾ (out of four)
Seen 19 March 2022 in the Coolidge Corner Theatre GoldScreen (Oscar Shorts, digital)
"Ala Kachuu - Take and Run" is built on hammering things home as well, but then, that's sort of the point: Sezim (Alina Turdumamatova) is a bright young woman who dreams of going to University but has to practically run away to do it, only to find herself kidnapped into marriage, and it's not even an arranged one - she was just convenient. Husband Dayrbek (Nurbek Esengazy Uulu) seems decent, as such men go, but Sezim has no intention of becoming one of the women her mother's age who eventually accepts this as the way things are.
Writer/director Maria Brendle does excellent work keeping her eye on a certain line, where the film isn't just showing the cruelty and sexism of the culture in this part of Kyrgyzstan or how Sezim suffers, but isn't lecturing about how, as much as the men who kidnap force themselves upon their "wives", it is the women who eventually accept it that allow this system to be perpetuated. Granted, the audience is going to want Sezim to spell it out - she and friend Aksana (Madina Talipbekova) and kid sister Aygul (Aybike Erkinbekova) are clearly perceptive enough to understand it, but that kind of direct confrontation might keep the viewer from letting how people become complicit to bury their own shame and anger really fester - and, besides, a certain moment works best if someone figures it out herself.
It's also a striking film to watch generally; Brendle and her crew find the beauty in a land that is poor, isolated, and backward in many ways, and do a good job building high-speed escape attempts around someone who is clearly just driving for the first time or two. There's a great moment early on where Sezim and her mother are making bread together, which is apparently a major part or the wedding rituals, and the way that Sezim is just no good at it compared to her - but has still familiar enough to work in a shop later - is a great, quick way to establish her character. Alina Turdumamatova does a nice job of making Sezim feel like an ordinary girl who knows she deserves more rather than someone exceptional enough to break the system.
As I finish writing this, the awards have already been handed out (off-screen, apparently), because I saw them late and have had a busy-ish week. If I'd had a vote, it would have been for "Please Hold", although that was going to be a long shot. I'm not surprised "The Long Goodbye" won - a name as familiar as Riz Ahmed in a short gives it a heck of a boost - and certainly can't gripe about it.
Labels:
comedy,
Coolidge Corner,
Denmark,
drama,
independent,
Kyrgyzstan,
Poland,
satire,
sci-fi,
shorts,
Switzerland,
UK,
USA
Saturday, December 26, 2020
Curveball
This has a second weekend in The Coolidge's Virtual Screening Room through Sunday, and it's pretty good! I think I've said that the Goethe-Institut's presentations at the Coolidge have long been one of the theater's hidden gems - back before the virus, they were like $5 but you had to be there at 11am on a Sunday - and the larger window they've had has been pretty nice, even with the cost up to $12 (still pretty reasonable).
It's a real shame that it's pretty much the entire chance we get to see some of these movies, since they're not exactly arcane or difficult to get into. Curveball, for instance, has large chunks in English, tells a story that is fairly relevant to American lives, and is genuinely funny in ways that don't exactly require getting into a different cultural headspace. It could be an outsider critique of the USA, but isn't, really. But I've got no idea how well it will get on people's radar. They may or may not get U.S. distribution, and that distributor may not be able to get a slot on the various services. Heck, near as I can tell, the film that director Johannes Naber and star Sebastian Blomberg did five years earlier, Age of Cannibals, never got a particularly US-friendly release, and it really looks like something I'd enjoy seeing.
As an aside, part of how it's US-friendly is that it has a number of moments when it cuts to what people in power were doing publicly at the time - once even making it clear that this is a thing the characters were watching - and one of them was Colin Powell, whom my employers had breathlessly engaged to speak to us in as part of a monthly "town hall" conference call, and for as much as it seemed worthy of a little suspicion then - it was the sort of "I came from humble beginnings and made it this high, so obviously the system works in general" pep talk that you should probably expect from large corporations - it looks a bit worse when you're reminded what he was a part of, and how little consequences the people most responsible faced.
Curveball
* * * ¼ (out of four)
Seen 20 December 2020 in Jay's Living Room (Goethe-Instiut German Film/Coolidge Corner Theatre Virtual Screening Room, internet)
There must be an entry in Ebert's Little Movie Glossary about the way movies like Curveball start, with a little bit outside the main film's setting that isn't entirely dispensable but certainly shows what's about to happen at a larger scale in microcosm. Here, it's German chemical weapons inspector Wolf (Sebastian Blomberg) letting his American colleague Leslie (Virginia Kull) believe that he was married rather than a widower because he thought she was looking for an affair as they searched for WMDs in 1997 Iraq. Even without hindsight, we'd know that something like this was about to be writ large; fortunately, the movie knows how to hit those notes even if they won't be a surprise.
It picks up two years later, when Dr. Wolf is working in a BND lab outside Munich; as the department's foremost expert on anthrax production, he's tasked by his superior officer Schatz (Thorsten Merten) to aid agent Retzlaff (Michael Wittenborn) in debriefing refugee Rafid Alwan (Dar Salim), a 34-year-old chemical engineer who claims to have witnessed tests personally. Alwan is canny enough to keep details close to the vest until he has an apartment and promises of protection, but the BND is eager to find out what he knows - they are a small player in the global intelligence community, and might be able to trade this information to the Americans for Stasi files they have been guarding since the end of the Cold War. It's the sort of information that becomes extremely valuable after the 9/11 attacks in the U.S., because even if it's not reliable, it certainly fits the narrative that some in the Bush Administration want to sell.
For as cynical as the story being told is, there's something oddly gentle about the way director Johannes Naber and his co-writer Oliver Keidel go about telling it. Wolf and most of the people in his immediate orbit aren't really that ambitious - he's got a job he wants to do well, Rafid just wants to be safe in a new home, and everyone has a very human reluctance to admit when they've made a mistake, not really thinking about how those feelings can be weaponized. Even the people who wind up falling into the category of villain are human despite their amorality, personable enough that one might grasp for reasons they can be redeemed and not the bureaucratic idiots that become the targets of easy satire.
There's still a lot of dark humor to be mined from the situation, which starts out as a kind of goofily absurdist look at the BND: For all I know, the real-life Retzlaff does smoke an actual pipe, and their offices circa 1999 really did look fifteen or twenty years out of date, but it's kind of delightfully anti-James Bond in the way it goes the other extreme in how it embraces just how relatively irrelevant this one-time great power can sometimes seem, a second-class shop whose internal politics are petty still seeing itself as competing with the superpowers. As the film reaches 2001 and beyond, it becomes cheerfully ridiculous, with a car chase so silly it would make one laugh out loud even without the genuinely funny, important twist to it. The sheer enormity of the jigsaw puzzle Wolf is solving after being dismissed feels like self-parody without winking at the audience too much.
It's a line the film often has to be careful of with Dr. Wolf, but Sebastian Blomberg is on top of it, doing a very impressive job of making him believably one of the top men in his field but also just right when taken away from his area of expertise, impressive because the script calls for him to be aware of how he's in over his head some places but blindsided in others, and it never feels off. He's got a nice chemistry with Virginia Kull that lingers after Leslie turns out to be different from how he (and through him the audience) initially sees her, and she does nice work in not making those scenes feel like flipping a switch. Dar Salim is nifty as Rafid as well - fairly transparent to the audience, but just credible enough that folks who are invested in his story might believe him, and genuinely funny when he gets into ridiculous situations later on.
It's seemingly light for a movie about decisions that caused so much death and destruction, right down to the tagline incorporated into the opening titles ("A True Story, Unfortunately"). But there's a sort of terrible honesty in how both seemingly and actual reasonable people make these mistakes that can be seized upon by bad actors, and for all that Naber encourages us to laugh at the absurdity of it, the end result is never allowed to drift too far from the viewer's mind.
Also at eFilmCritic
It's a real shame that it's pretty much the entire chance we get to see some of these movies, since they're not exactly arcane or difficult to get into. Curveball, for instance, has large chunks in English, tells a story that is fairly relevant to American lives, and is genuinely funny in ways that don't exactly require getting into a different cultural headspace. It could be an outsider critique of the USA, but isn't, really. But I've got no idea how well it will get on people's radar. They may or may not get U.S. distribution, and that distributor may not be able to get a slot on the various services. Heck, near as I can tell, the film that director Johannes Naber and star Sebastian Blomberg did five years earlier, Age of Cannibals, never got a particularly US-friendly release, and it really looks like something I'd enjoy seeing.
As an aside, part of how it's US-friendly is that it has a number of moments when it cuts to what people in power were doing publicly at the time - once even making it clear that this is a thing the characters were watching - and one of them was Colin Powell, whom my employers had breathlessly engaged to speak to us in as part of a monthly "town hall" conference call, and for as much as it seemed worthy of a little suspicion then - it was the sort of "I came from humble beginnings and made it this high, so obviously the system works in general" pep talk that you should probably expect from large corporations - it looks a bit worse when you're reminded what he was a part of, and how little consequences the people most responsible faced.
Curveball
* * * ¼ (out of four)
Seen 20 December 2020 in Jay's Living Room (Goethe-Instiut German Film/Coolidge Corner Theatre Virtual Screening Room, internet)
There must be an entry in Ebert's Little Movie Glossary about the way movies like Curveball start, with a little bit outside the main film's setting that isn't entirely dispensable but certainly shows what's about to happen at a larger scale in microcosm. Here, it's German chemical weapons inspector Wolf (Sebastian Blomberg) letting his American colleague Leslie (Virginia Kull) believe that he was married rather than a widower because he thought she was looking for an affair as they searched for WMDs in 1997 Iraq. Even without hindsight, we'd know that something like this was about to be writ large; fortunately, the movie knows how to hit those notes even if they won't be a surprise.
It picks up two years later, when Dr. Wolf is working in a BND lab outside Munich; as the department's foremost expert on anthrax production, he's tasked by his superior officer Schatz (Thorsten Merten) to aid agent Retzlaff (Michael Wittenborn) in debriefing refugee Rafid Alwan (Dar Salim), a 34-year-old chemical engineer who claims to have witnessed tests personally. Alwan is canny enough to keep details close to the vest until he has an apartment and promises of protection, but the BND is eager to find out what he knows - they are a small player in the global intelligence community, and might be able to trade this information to the Americans for Stasi files they have been guarding since the end of the Cold War. It's the sort of information that becomes extremely valuable after the 9/11 attacks in the U.S., because even if it's not reliable, it certainly fits the narrative that some in the Bush Administration want to sell.
For as cynical as the story being told is, there's something oddly gentle about the way director Johannes Naber and his co-writer Oliver Keidel go about telling it. Wolf and most of the people in his immediate orbit aren't really that ambitious - he's got a job he wants to do well, Rafid just wants to be safe in a new home, and everyone has a very human reluctance to admit when they've made a mistake, not really thinking about how those feelings can be weaponized. Even the people who wind up falling into the category of villain are human despite their amorality, personable enough that one might grasp for reasons they can be redeemed and not the bureaucratic idiots that become the targets of easy satire.
There's still a lot of dark humor to be mined from the situation, which starts out as a kind of goofily absurdist look at the BND: For all I know, the real-life Retzlaff does smoke an actual pipe, and their offices circa 1999 really did look fifteen or twenty years out of date, but it's kind of delightfully anti-James Bond in the way it goes the other extreme in how it embraces just how relatively irrelevant this one-time great power can sometimes seem, a second-class shop whose internal politics are petty still seeing itself as competing with the superpowers. As the film reaches 2001 and beyond, it becomes cheerfully ridiculous, with a car chase so silly it would make one laugh out loud even without the genuinely funny, important twist to it. The sheer enormity of the jigsaw puzzle Wolf is solving after being dismissed feels like self-parody without winking at the audience too much.
It's a line the film often has to be careful of with Dr. Wolf, but Sebastian Blomberg is on top of it, doing a very impressive job of making him believably one of the top men in his field but also just right when taken away from his area of expertise, impressive because the script calls for him to be aware of how he's in over his head some places but blindsided in others, and it never feels off. He's got a nice chemistry with Virginia Kull that lingers after Leslie turns out to be different from how he (and through him the audience) initially sees her, and she does nice work in not making those scenes feel like flipping a switch. Dar Salim is nifty as Rafid as well - fairly transparent to the audience, but just credible enough that folks who are invested in his story might believe him, and genuinely funny when he gets into ridiculous situations later on.
It's seemingly light for a movie about decisions that caused so much death and destruction, right down to the tagline incorporated into the opening titles ("A True Story, Unfortunately"). But there's a sort of terrible honesty in how both seemingly and actual reasonable people make these mistakes that can be seized upon by bad actors, and for all that Naber encourages us to laugh at the absurdity of it, the end result is never allowed to drift too far from the viewer's mind.
Also at eFilmCritic
Tuesday, October 01, 2019
The Day Shall Come
I like the Arlington Capitol well enough, but when a movie is only opening there on its first week in the Boston area, that's not necessarily a red flag but it kind of makes one wonder a bit. In this case, The Day Shall Come opened right at the same time as a couple of things that had big crossover appeal in Downton Abbey and Judy, so both the boutique houses and the multiplexes that often have an extra screen had a lot of space spoken for, and this one was confrontational political but probably not quite brilliant enough to take a risk on.
As I mention in the EFC review, though, I do wonder if a room large enough that the handful of people who liked Four Lions and would seek the next movie from that guy out could wind up spread out is the worst possible way to see this one. It's edgy enough that I think the sensation of other people enjoying it - not just from big laughs, but a nearby snort or the sensation of someone nearby getting tensed up (or less so) - could be contagious. There's stuff in it where it may not appropriate to laugh, and feeling that approval might be a big deal. At home, the lack of anybody in the room to not like your reaction could be important too.
Ah, well. Maybe it gets more shows in Arlington after Thursday, but I kind of doubt it. Here's hoping people find it on demand!
The Day Shall Come
* * ¾ (out of four)
Seen 27 September 2019 in Capitol Theatre #3 (first-run, DCP)
The Day Shall Come seems like it would be a lot more fun in a packed house of folks who are into it, but where are you going to scare up that sort of crowd for a dark comedy about the FBI trying to bust a mentally ill man for terrorism? It's not quite weird or star-powered enough for the sort of buzz that Sorry to Bother You could get, for instance, even if it is thinking along the same lines. So it screens for three of us, and we laugh, but without the reinforcement that would have the laughter filling the room.
It opens with Moses al-Shabbaz (Marchánt Davis) and a couple other members of his small congregation trying to get some small-timers to stop working the street and work on his community farm, which is well-behind on its rent. He talks about someday striking a blow against the "gentrificators" and the white people who have been keeping them down, but he's both practical enough to know that he needs a much larger movement and schizophrenic enough to believe God spoke to him through a duck and that he'll be able to topple the cranes with the power of his mind. Meanwhile, the Miami office of the FBI is busily entrapping confused Middle-Eastern.people, and while the local chief (Denis O'Hare) tells Special Agent Kendra Glack (Anna Kendrick) that in the current environment, brown perps play better than black, Moses is a guy that they've been keeping an eye on, and the next one they decide to focus on.
The film is stacked from top to bottom with people trying to do the right thing via fraud, from Moses to every level of law enforcement, with the obvious added wrinkle that Moses doesn't always know what's real and what is not. It's a mess piled three or four levels deep and most everybody involved is so invested in their delusions from the start that it never occurs to them to examine their amorality, with brief moments of lucidity unable to slow what's steaming ahead out of control. If co-writer/director Christopher Morris's previous film Four Lions played on how most would-be terrorists aren't very bright to try to allay the racist fears of the 2000s while also hinting that the promised infamy could make jihad more attractive, The Day Shall Come gets its fuel from an equally stupid professionalism and efficiency, with law enforcement so certain of there being monsters around every corner and driven by an almost corporate need to show results.
Full review on EFilmCritic
As I mention in the EFC review, though, I do wonder if a room large enough that the handful of people who liked Four Lions and would seek the next movie from that guy out could wind up spread out is the worst possible way to see this one. It's edgy enough that I think the sensation of other people enjoying it - not just from big laughs, but a nearby snort or the sensation of someone nearby getting tensed up (or less so) - could be contagious. There's stuff in it where it may not appropriate to laugh, and feeling that approval might be a big deal. At home, the lack of anybody in the room to not like your reaction could be important too.
Ah, well. Maybe it gets more shows in Arlington after Thursday, but I kind of doubt it. Here's hoping people find it on demand!
The Day Shall Come
* * ¾ (out of four)
Seen 27 September 2019 in Capitol Theatre #3 (first-run, DCP)
The Day Shall Come seems like it would be a lot more fun in a packed house of folks who are into it, but where are you going to scare up that sort of crowd for a dark comedy about the FBI trying to bust a mentally ill man for terrorism? It's not quite weird or star-powered enough for the sort of buzz that Sorry to Bother You could get, for instance, even if it is thinking along the same lines. So it screens for three of us, and we laugh, but without the reinforcement that would have the laughter filling the room.
It opens with Moses al-Shabbaz (Marchánt Davis) and a couple other members of his small congregation trying to get some small-timers to stop working the street and work on his community farm, which is well-behind on its rent. He talks about someday striking a blow against the "gentrificators" and the white people who have been keeping them down, but he's both practical enough to know that he needs a much larger movement and schizophrenic enough to believe God spoke to him through a duck and that he'll be able to topple the cranes with the power of his mind. Meanwhile, the Miami office of the FBI is busily entrapping confused Middle-Eastern.people, and while the local chief (Denis O'Hare) tells Special Agent Kendra Glack (Anna Kendrick) that in the current environment, brown perps play better than black, Moses is a guy that they've been keeping an eye on, and the next one they decide to focus on.
The film is stacked from top to bottom with people trying to do the right thing via fraud, from Moses to every level of law enforcement, with the obvious added wrinkle that Moses doesn't always know what's real and what is not. It's a mess piled three or four levels deep and most everybody involved is so invested in their delusions from the start that it never occurs to them to examine their amorality, with brief moments of lucidity unable to slow what's steaming ahead out of control. If co-writer/director Christopher Morris's previous film Four Lions played on how most would-be terrorists aren't very bright to try to allay the racist fears of the 2000s while also hinting that the promised infamy could make jihad more attractive, The Day Shall Come gets its fuel from an equally stupid professionalism and efficiency, with law enforcement so certain of there being monsters around every corner and driven by an almost corporate need to show results.
Full review on EFilmCritic
Monday, March 18, 2019
Three Husbands
Just spent a week and a weekend in Hong Kong, and I'm kind of as surprised as anyone how little of my vacation was directly movie-related, given that I'm me, Hong Kong cinema was a major inspiration for the trip, and even local films tend to show with English subtitles there, but what can I say? The Film Archive didn't have much going when I was in the neighborhood, I tended to wear myself down by the end of the day, and Captain Marvel pushed a lot off of the city's screens once it opened (two days before it did in the U.S.). There actually wasn't a whole lot of local film playing at times I wanted to see it. I was really hoping the Jackie Chan picture that opened on the Mainland for Chinese New Year would be around, but nope. Instead, I saw Captain Marvel opening day (it was pouring rain anyway), and nearly screwed that up by going to the wrong theater.
But, walking around on my last day there - always the best way to spend the end of a vacation, I pretty much stumbled onto this:

They were playing host to the European Film Festival, but also had a 7:40pm showing of Three Husbands, the new one from Fruit Chan, and, hey, I'd heard of him. Mostly in terms of his contributions to horror anthologies, with this apparently more typical of his general output (although he's also co-directed at least one action movie with Sammo Hung and has a big-looking action-adventure coming out this year). It was being called the third part of his "prostitute trilogy", but let's be honest - is two movies seventeen years ago plus a new one a trilogy, or just a guy going back to something that worked for him before? I mean, have people been asking him when this was going to come for a decade and a half?
Hey, it was a full house, at least, enough that I was seated in the front row, munching down popcorn for what wasn't really a popcorn movie because I was hungry. Not bad for a Sunday night screening of a movie that seemed to be down to one or two shows a day, and not always the same ones (HK scheduling seems a bit more creative than that in Boston). I'm sure that absolutely everyone there had a better handle on the movie and what it was saying than I did, but you know what - it was Hong Kong as hell, and that's not a bad finale for the trip.
(Oh, one more aside - they asked if I was part of their membership program at both the box office and concession stand but, obviously, I don't join those when I'm just going to be in a country for a week. But when I was going upstairs, I saw that Broadway is apparently owned by AMC by some of the signage, and I started to wonder if my Stubs A-List membership would have gotten me anywhere!)
Anyway, good movie, neat theater - it's got both a video store and a film-related bookshop in there, on top of being a fair place to see a movie. And I highly recommend Hong Kong as a vacation, especially if you've been slurping their movies down for years.
Sanfu (Three Husbands)
* * * ½ (out of four)
Seen 10 March 2019 in Broadway Cinematheque (first-run, DCP)
I'm not in a position to wonder too much about the critical reception Three Husbands has received in its native Hong Kong; even more than most movies from the region, familiarity with its satirical targets, language, and other pieces of context will almost certainly enhance a picture that is already an impressive bit of independent filmmaking. It's the sort of film that's built to be a critical darling, especially with filmmaker Fruit Chan Gor returning to the sort of thing that first made him his name twenty years ago, maybe flattering the art-house audience a bit.
It opens with "Brother Four-Eyes" (Chan Charm-man) at a brothel just across the water in Zuhai, seemingly making time with a girl who claims to also be from Hong Kong (Larine Tang) before the police raid the place. His shtick involves saying he'd marry a girl, and it seems to be sincere, as he actually pursues Ah Mui (Chloe Maayan), who plies her trade on a boat docked off Lantau Island. Voluptuous and seemingly insatiable, she's too good an earner for "Second Brother" (Chan Man-lei) to let go easy. He eventually relents, but life on land (and off her back) is strange for Mui, while the frequency of their lovemaking is among the things that have their neighbors looking askance.
So, what's the metaphor here? Is Mui Hong Kong, passed between men who both exploit and claim to love her, or is that maybe more the way an outsider would read the situation rather than the sort of movie Chan would make for his neighbors a generation after the handover? Even if that's not it, there's still not a moment involving her or the general set-up that doesn't feel like it's about more; Mui is too blank a slate and the events a little too cheeky for it to just be taken at face value. Chan is certainly talking about the base-level urges of love and sex and how they get mixed up with the commercial, although the specific ways that relates to Hong Kong and the Tanka people never quite snapped into focus.
Full review at EFilmCritic
But, walking around on my last day there - always the best way to spend the end of a vacation, I pretty much stumbled onto this:

They were playing host to the European Film Festival, but also had a 7:40pm showing of Three Husbands, the new one from Fruit Chan, and, hey, I'd heard of him. Mostly in terms of his contributions to horror anthologies, with this apparently more typical of his general output (although he's also co-directed at least one action movie with Sammo Hung and has a big-looking action-adventure coming out this year). It was being called the third part of his "prostitute trilogy", but let's be honest - is two movies seventeen years ago plus a new one a trilogy, or just a guy going back to something that worked for him before? I mean, have people been asking him when this was going to come for a decade and a half?
Hey, it was a full house, at least, enough that I was seated in the front row, munching down popcorn for what wasn't really a popcorn movie because I was hungry. Not bad for a Sunday night screening of a movie that seemed to be down to one or two shows a day, and not always the same ones (HK scheduling seems a bit more creative than that in Boston). I'm sure that absolutely everyone there had a better handle on the movie and what it was saying than I did, but you know what - it was Hong Kong as hell, and that's not a bad finale for the trip.
(Oh, one more aside - they asked if I was part of their membership program at both the box office and concession stand but, obviously, I don't join those when I'm just going to be in a country for a week. But when I was going upstairs, I saw that Broadway is apparently owned by AMC by some of the signage, and I started to wonder if my Stubs A-List membership would have gotten me anywhere!)
Anyway, good movie, neat theater - it's got both a video store and a film-related bookshop in there, on top of being a fair place to see a movie. And I highly recommend Hong Kong as a vacation, especially if you've been slurping their movies down for years.
Sanfu (Three Husbands)
* * * ½ (out of four)
Seen 10 March 2019 in Broadway Cinematheque (first-run, DCP)
I'm not in a position to wonder too much about the critical reception Three Husbands has received in its native Hong Kong; even more than most movies from the region, familiarity with its satirical targets, language, and other pieces of context will almost certainly enhance a picture that is already an impressive bit of independent filmmaking. It's the sort of film that's built to be a critical darling, especially with filmmaker Fruit Chan Gor returning to the sort of thing that first made him his name twenty years ago, maybe flattering the art-house audience a bit.
It opens with "Brother Four-Eyes" (Chan Charm-man) at a brothel just across the water in Zuhai, seemingly making time with a girl who claims to also be from Hong Kong (Larine Tang) before the police raid the place. His shtick involves saying he'd marry a girl, and it seems to be sincere, as he actually pursues Ah Mui (Chloe Maayan), who plies her trade on a boat docked off Lantau Island. Voluptuous and seemingly insatiable, she's too good an earner for "Second Brother" (Chan Man-lei) to let go easy. He eventually relents, but life on land (and off her back) is strange for Mui, while the frequency of their lovemaking is among the things that have their neighbors looking askance.
So, what's the metaphor here? Is Mui Hong Kong, passed between men who both exploit and claim to love her, or is that maybe more the way an outsider would read the situation rather than the sort of movie Chan would make for his neighbors a generation after the handover? Even if that's not it, there's still not a moment involving her or the general set-up that doesn't feel like it's about more; Mui is too blank a slate and the events a little too cheeky for it to just be taken at face value. Chan is certainly talking about the base-level urges of love and sex and how they get mixed up with the commercial, although the specific ways that relates to Hong Kong and the Tanka people never quite snapped into focus.
Full review at EFilmCritic
Monday, December 03, 2018
This Week in Tickets: 26 November 2018 - 2 December 2018
The theme for this week: Use the chance to see something in theaters wisely.
What that means is that when The Great Buddha+ shows up on the Harvard Film Archive's schedule after you've been seeing the distributor tweet it up for a year (though somehow never registering that it's on Amazon to rent), you go for it. Maybe you don't love it, but it's still big-screen worthy.
Similarly, when you see that the new animated film by Mamoru Hosoda is only scheduled for a day here and there, you book tickets for Mirai a week in advance and then tell other people reading your blog about it. Hosoda is a pretty reliable guy, and he's made another pretty darn good animated film about youth and family, and I'm a bit surprised the distributors aren't giving him a bigger push beyond anime fans here. Much like Mary and the Witch's Flower at the start of the year, this feels like something that could have done okay alternating dubbed and subtitled shows at Kendall Square (as some GKids productions have), or even cracked the regular lineup at Boston Common (as happened with The Boy and the Beast, Your Name, and A Silent Voice.
That was Thursday; Friday was the first night of Prospect at the Brattle. That sci-fi western turned out a whole lot better than I'd expected, although it turned out my expectations were low, as I'd seen and like the original short film version four years ago but not connected it with the new trailer.
Saturday I got up relatively early for 2.0, anticipating a big crowd for the Enthiran sequel, and wanting to see it in Tamil, the language it was filmed in, and 3D, which I just like though it turns out that it was captured that way. It wasn't the complete "what the heck is going on up on screen and why is the audience going so nuts for it?" experience of the first, but, honestly, what can compare to going to Enthiran and not knowing that Rajinikanth is a whole thing? Sadly, there wasn't quite the same dedicated fanbase for Me Dong-seok aka Don Lee when I saw Unstoppable that evening, with just a handful of us in the theater. Too bad, because it's a good, if modest, dumb action movie.
There were plans for Sunday, but it rained, and after coming back from the grocery store, I wasn't really in a mood to turn around and go back out. So I decided to shrink the pile from my last delivery of movies a bit and watch the UltraHD Blu-ray of Helios. Not a particularly great thriller, but serviceable, and the 4K transfer looked fantastic, like "why isn't everything released on this because now regular HD is ruined for the next few days" great. I don't actually use the 4K abilities of the player and TV that often, since I mostly watch new stuff and most of the high-res discs I get are stuff I've seen in the theater. I do kind of wonder why more people aren't releasing these - Hong Kong seems to lag a couple months behind the Blu-ray release (frustrating!), and the guys who make specialty discs are relatively slow to embrace it, aside from Lionsgate figuring that there might be another fifty bucks to squeeze out of those of us who keep buying the Evil Dead movies. Still, after having seen some of the limits of 2K projection with Mirai a few days before, it was cool to see just how good something can look.
Not sure what will go my Letterboxd page today, but keep watching it for blog previews.
Helios
* * ¾ (out of four)
Seen 2 December 2018 in Jay's Living Room (recent acquisitions, Hong Kong 4K Blu-ray)
Helios is a slick, well-staged thriller that ultimately winds up being completely inconsequential. Sure, some characters don't make it to the end and Hong Kong doesn't get obliterated, but there are at best momentary thrills. It shows us a shadowy world of arms dealers and capable agents, but there's no larger tension, just people playing a fast-paced game of chess, and where you can pick the double agent out not because he actually makes sense but because (he does not!) but because he keeps showing up despite having nothing to do.
Maybe it plays differently in Hong Kong, where this sort of nuclear thriller can be especially high-stakes because something as powerful and portable as the DC-8 that serves as the film's Macguffin could basically erase what they consider to be their entire country on the one hand while on the other they are feeling the pinch as China uses them for their own purposes. It's interesting and maybe telling that much of the movie and especially the finale seems to show the HK-based police seeing their South Korean counterparts as friends and allies but look at the representative from Beijing with suspicion (kudos to Wang Xueqi, who makes Song An professional, sincere, and just a smidge arrogant in how he's always considering the bigger picture).
Still, for all that this movie is a bunch of very serious people in suits (and slightly more colorful villains) striding purposefully, it can work pretty well in the moment. It is that sort of urgent, cut to feel like it's laser-focused with no wasted moments and shot with a steely color palette, making fine use of drone cams to get into the canyons of Hong Kong's streets, giving a great view of the action. And, as in the filmmakers' Cold War movies, the action is top notch, with a fight scene between Nick Cheung Ka-fai and Janice Man Wing-san a particularly terrific example (also, the ladies don't ever fight each other).
I've read somewhere that there's a sequel in development, and maybe that will give it more resolution - although given that the filmmakers have done Cold War 2 and are supposedly working on Cold War 3 before Helios 2, I wonder if that's a little white lie they told their Chinese investors to be able to leave things more open-ended than usual. Without something like that, it's kind of like the recent Jack Ryan series - well-made, never actually boring, but also not leaving you with hair standing on end when it's done.

What that means is that when The Great Buddha+ shows up on the Harvard Film Archive's schedule after you've been seeing the distributor tweet it up for a year (though somehow never registering that it's on Amazon to rent), you go for it. Maybe you don't love it, but it's still big-screen worthy.
Similarly, when you see that the new animated film by Mamoru Hosoda is only scheduled for a day here and there, you book tickets for Mirai a week in advance and then tell other people reading your blog about it. Hosoda is a pretty reliable guy, and he's made another pretty darn good animated film about youth and family, and I'm a bit surprised the distributors aren't giving him a bigger push beyond anime fans here. Much like Mary and the Witch's Flower at the start of the year, this feels like something that could have done okay alternating dubbed and subtitled shows at Kendall Square (as some GKids productions have), or even cracked the regular lineup at Boston Common (as happened with The Boy and the Beast, Your Name, and A Silent Voice.
That was Thursday; Friday was the first night of Prospect at the Brattle. That sci-fi western turned out a whole lot better than I'd expected, although it turned out my expectations were low, as I'd seen and like the original short film version four years ago but not connected it with the new trailer.
Saturday I got up relatively early for 2.0, anticipating a big crowd for the Enthiran sequel, and wanting to see it in Tamil, the language it was filmed in, and 3D, which I just like though it turns out that it was captured that way. It wasn't the complete "what the heck is going on up on screen and why is the audience going so nuts for it?" experience of the first, but, honestly, what can compare to going to Enthiran and not knowing that Rajinikanth is a whole thing? Sadly, there wasn't quite the same dedicated fanbase for Me Dong-seok aka Don Lee when I saw Unstoppable that evening, with just a handful of us in the theater. Too bad, because it's a good, if modest, dumb action movie.
There were plans for Sunday, but it rained, and after coming back from the grocery store, I wasn't really in a mood to turn around and go back out. So I decided to shrink the pile from my last delivery of movies a bit and watch the UltraHD Blu-ray of Helios. Not a particularly great thriller, but serviceable, and the 4K transfer looked fantastic, like "why isn't everything released on this because now regular HD is ruined for the next few days" great. I don't actually use the 4K abilities of the player and TV that often, since I mostly watch new stuff and most of the high-res discs I get are stuff I've seen in the theater. I do kind of wonder why more people aren't releasing these - Hong Kong seems to lag a couple months behind the Blu-ray release (frustrating!), and the guys who make specialty discs are relatively slow to embrace it, aside from Lionsgate figuring that there might be another fifty bucks to squeeze out of those of us who keep buying the Evil Dead movies. Still, after having seen some of the limits of 2K projection with Mirai a few days before, it was cool to see just how good something can look.
Not sure what will go my Letterboxd page today, but keep watching it for blog previews.
Helios
* * ¾ (out of four)
Seen 2 December 2018 in Jay's Living Room (recent acquisitions, Hong Kong 4K Blu-ray)
Helios is a slick, well-staged thriller that ultimately winds up being completely inconsequential. Sure, some characters don't make it to the end and Hong Kong doesn't get obliterated, but there are at best momentary thrills. It shows us a shadowy world of arms dealers and capable agents, but there's no larger tension, just people playing a fast-paced game of chess, and where you can pick the double agent out not because he actually makes sense but because (he does not!) but because he keeps showing up despite having nothing to do.
Maybe it plays differently in Hong Kong, where this sort of nuclear thriller can be especially high-stakes because something as powerful and portable as the DC-8 that serves as the film's Macguffin could basically erase what they consider to be their entire country on the one hand while on the other they are feeling the pinch as China uses them for their own purposes. It's interesting and maybe telling that much of the movie and especially the finale seems to show the HK-based police seeing their South Korean counterparts as friends and allies but look at the representative from Beijing with suspicion (kudos to Wang Xueqi, who makes Song An professional, sincere, and just a smidge arrogant in how he's always considering the bigger picture).
Still, for all that this movie is a bunch of very serious people in suits (and slightly more colorful villains) striding purposefully, it can work pretty well in the moment. It is that sort of urgent, cut to feel like it's laser-focused with no wasted moments and shot with a steely color palette, making fine use of drone cams to get into the canyons of Hong Kong's streets, giving a great view of the action. And, as in the filmmakers' Cold War movies, the action is top notch, with a fight scene between Nick Cheung Ka-fai and Janice Man Wing-san a particularly terrific example (also, the ladies don't ever fight each other).
I've read somewhere that there's a sequel in development, and maybe that will give it more resolution - although given that the filmmakers have done Cold War 2 and are supposedly working on Cold War 3 before Helios 2, I wonder if that's a little white lie they told their Chinese investors to be able to leave things more open-ended than usual. Without something like that, it's kind of like the recent Jack Ryan series - well-made, never actually boring, but also not leaving you with hair standing on end when it's done.
Labels:
3D,
action Hong Kong,
animation,
anime,
black-and-white,
comedy,
drama,
family,
independent,
India,
Japan,
Korea,
satire,
sci-fi,
Taiwan,
This Week In Tickets,
thriller,
TWIT 2018,
USA,
western
Wednesday, September 12, 2018
This Week in Tickets: 3 September 2018 - 9 September 2018
Kind of a boring week at the cinemas, but one where I finally caught up with some of the stuff I'd been meaning to see for a while.
I mentioned being a slug all last weekend, at it lasted through Labor Day, when I finallly caught a new release and The Little Stranger wasn't very good, which was frustrating because you could see all the things it could have been saying but which it never really went for.
The middle of the week was good for catching up, with Crazy Rich Asians at Fresh Pond on Wednesday and Sorry to Bother You at the Somerville on Thursday. That's kind of a fantastic run for the latter, really - I think it opened just as I went to Montreal in July and is still kicking in a few theaters two months later. Part of that is that this theater is not opening a lot with construction going on and the big 70mm fest coming up, but it's outlasting bigger, more recent things.
After that, another weekend where not a lot opened, and then pretty much all of Sunday was spent getting too and from Revere to see Maquia: When the Promised Flower Blooms, which I'd missed here for being at Fantasia and missed at Fantasia, but which I wound up really liking. It makes a nice bookend for the week with The Little Stranger, both being fantastical end-of-an-era stories, but the anime wound up looking better the closer you examine it, while the British one just didn't come together.
More coming up on my Letterboxd, including stuff I just didn't get the chance to do back in Canada..
Crazy Rich Asians
* * * ½ (out of four)
Seen 5 September 2018 in Apple Cinemas Cambridge #2 (first-run, DCP)
Crazy Rich Asians doesn't stray far from the romantic comedy template, but it seems like it's been so long since Hollywood produced one of those that standing out isn't necessary. You've just got to do it wil enough to not trip over your own feet, and you'll be good. And it does, right from... okay, maybe not quite the unnecessary prelude at the start, but it quickly establishes a bunch of charismatic characters, an entertaining situation, and slick enough packaging to make it watchable, and then gets out of the way.
And, really, why wouldn't you just get out of Constance Wu's way here? She's charming and funny even while leaving most of the actual gags to other characters, and nails the right expression and emotion in every moment. She's got a pretty darn good cast to play off of, most notably Awkwafina and Michelle Yeoh, but it goes all the way down to people who are just in one or two scenes, doing something in the background that amplifies what's working up front.
Plus, there's a really enjoyable level of romantic fantasy to it - the filmmakers know that these movies with a touch of Cinderella to them need nice things, but they're good at pivoting away from tacky consumerism except when the grossness of it is going to figure into the story. Director John M. Chu not only gets scenes playing out in snappy but not artificial fashion, but also frames shots really well - he uses space and crowds to focus attention just right, but never in an artsy, ostentatious way.
There's a mid-credit teaser for a sequel, and that one will be a tougher sell, with a less immediately-likable main character and heightened expectations. But that's 2020's problem; this is just a solid old-Hollywood romance.
Sorry to Bother You
* * * ½ (out of four)
Seen 6 September 2018 in Somerville Theatre #1 (first-run, DCP)
The neat thing about Sorry to Bother You is that, while it does quickly become just as weird as it promised to be from the previews and opening scenes, it winds up feeling a little less peculiar than it maybe should. There's a talented cast that plays it fairly straight, and beyond that, the filmmakers always make sure that the audience knows where they're coming from. It's mostly good folks navigating a strange world.
But never one so strange that it's disconnected. Sometimes filmmaker Boots Riley hammers things down hard, although he kind of has to (simply advocating for a labor union seems radical in this day and age). Sometimes he takes a hard turn into the bizarre, and you have to just gape in wonder at the lengths he'll go to talk about how capitalism seems determined to grind humanity back to slavery, with people of color on the front lines. Among other things - he's got a lot to talk about and stitches it together well.
And there's always someone or something entertaining in front of the camera. Lakeith Stanfield (dubbed or otherwise) makes an entertainingly too-cool-for-his-own-good semi-hero, paired with a series of great foils from Danny Glover to Tessa Thompson (who should be in all the things) to Armie Hammer. He and the crew build a surreal world that never quite seems to go full Gondry, and the script always seems to be at a perfect spot between snappy and deadpan.
I'm sorry I put this off so long and glad my local theater kept it. It's a great big-screen movie though one I'll probably also love going through on disc.

I mentioned being a slug all last weekend, at it lasted through Labor Day, when I finallly caught a new release and The Little Stranger wasn't very good, which was frustrating because you could see all the things it could have been saying but which it never really went for.
The middle of the week was good for catching up, with Crazy Rich Asians at Fresh Pond on Wednesday and Sorry to Bother You at the Somerville on Thursday. That's kind of a fantastic run for the latter, really - I think it opened just as I went to Montreal in July and is still kicking in a few theaters two months later. Part of that is that this theater is not opening a lot with construction going on and the big 70mm fest coming up, but it's outlasting bigger, more recent things.
After that, another weekend where not a lot opened, and then pretty much all of Sunday was spent getting too and from Revere to see Maquia: When the Promised Flower Blooms, which I'd missed here for being at Fantasia and missed at Fantasia, but which I wound up really liking. It makes a nice bookend for the week with The Little Stranger, both being fantastical end-of-an-era stories, but the anime wound up looking better the closer you examine it, while the British one just didn't come together.
More coming up on my Letterboxd, including stuff I just didn't get the chance to do back in Canada..
Crazy Rich Asians
* * * ½ (out of four)
Seen 5 September 2018 in Apple Cinemas Cambridge #2 (first-run, DCP)
Crazy Rich Asians doesn't stray far from the romantic comedy template, but it seems like it's been so long since Hollywood produced one of those that standing out isn't necessary. You've just got to do it wil enough to not trip over your own feet, and you'll be good. And it does, right from... okay, maybe not quite the unnecessary prelude at the start, but it quickly establishes a bunch of charismatic characters, an entertaining situation, and slick enough packaging to make it watchable, and then gets out of the way.
And, really, why wouldn't you just get out of Constance Wu's way here? She's charming and funny even while leaving most of the actual gags to other characters, and nails the right expression and emotion in every moment. She's got a pretty darn good cast to play off of, most notably Awkwafina and Michelle Yeoh, but it goes all the way down to people who are just in one or two scenes, doing something in the background that amplifies what's working up front.
Plus, there's a really enjoyable level of romantic fantasy to it - the filmmakers know that these movies with a touch of Cinderella to them need nice things, but they're good at pivoting away from tacky consumerism except when the grossness of it is going to figure into the story. Director John M. Chu not only gets scenes playing out in snappy but not artificial fashion, but also frames shots really well - he uses space and crowds to focus attention just right, but never in an artsy, ostentatious way.
There's a mid-credit teaser for a sequel, and that one will be a tougher sell, with a less immediately-likable main character and heightened expectations. But that's 2020's problem; this is just a solid old-Hollywood romance.
Sorry to Bother You
* * * ½ (out of four)
Seen 6 September 2018 in Somerville Theatre #1 (first-run, DCP)
The neat thing about Sorry to Bother You is that, while it does quickly become just as weird as it promised to be from the previews and opening scenes, it winds up feeling a little less peculiar than it maybe should. There's a talented cast that plays it fairly straight, and beyond that, the filmmakers always make sure that the audience knows where they're coming from. It's mostly good folks navigating a strange world.
But never one so strange that it's disconnected. Sometimes filmmaker Boots Riley hammers things down hard, although he kind of has to (simply advocating for a labor union seems radical in this day and age). Sometimes he takes a hard turn into the bizarre, and you have to just gape in wonder at the lengths he'll go to talk about how capitalism seems determined to grind humanity back to slavery, with people of color on the front lines. Among other things - he's got a lot to talk about and stitches it together well.
And there's always someone or something entertaining in front of the camera. Lakeith Stanfield (dubbed or otherwise) makes an entertainingly too-cool-for-his-own-good semi-hero, paired with a series of great foils from Danny Glover to Tessa Thompson (who should be in all the things) to Armie Hammer. He and the crew build a surreal world that never quite seems to go full Gondry, and the script always seems to be at a perfect spot between snappy and deadpan.
I'm sorry I put this off so long and glad my local theater kept it. It's a great big-screen movie though one I'll probably also love going through on disc.
Tuesday, January 30, 2018
Grady Hendrix's Hong-Kong-a-Thon: Organized Crime Triad Bureau, Fong Kai Yuk, Expect the Unexpected, Cheap Killers, Kickboxer's Tears, and On the Run
Man, did I envy the people who were able to do this on a reasonable night's sleep and no travel issues. I zonked out quite a bit during every one of these movies, so I can't say a whole lot about them, but I can at least tell myself that I may have achieved what programmer Grady Hendrix was going for here: Eleven hours marinating in the energetic, violent world of Hong Kong genre cinema, mind coming out fried but happy, kind of flabbergasted at what I've seen and my head messed up. Sorry all you guys who did this sensibly missed out on the experience!
See, my plan was to take the 2:15am bus out of South Station, arrive at 9am, meet my brother Matt (visiting from Chicago) for brunch, and then mosey on over to the Anthology Film Archive and get there early enough to find myself a good seat. And it looked like things might go even easier, as I got there just after midnight, and there was a 1am bus. They actually let me on before it turned out the bus was sold out and I had to get off. But, hey, easy come, easy go. At least, until 2:15 comes and there's no driver. We're told the driver won't be there until four. That's our 10am brunch gone. Soon, it's five, I'm eying other lines (Megabus had a 6am departure but I couldn't find it on the site), they're saying any moment now, but I'm adding the 6.75 hours that the local takes thinking that would cut it close. I can't get them to switch me to the 6:30 local, which is sold out, but can get on the 6:45. It's a local that gets into George Washington Bridge terminal at 11 (instead of the usual Port Authority), which only has an A-line subways stop. I just miss it, it's fifteen minutes until the next one (less learned - you don't necessarily really need to pee), and then the train is slow, the stations are confusing, and the upshot is, I get to the AFA at 12:45 for a 12:30 show.

It's an unassuming building, a former courthouse without a concession stand and two screens, with the second presumably hidden somewhere behind the box office on the first floor. It reminds me of the Harvard Film Archive, not just because of the name and rules against snacks, but because it's got a fairly academic bent even though there's room for fun. The room is also pretty basic - it seats 208 because the rows are close together and the seats are not as wide as they could be, and a few quick glances up to the booth showed paired 35mm projectors and what looks like a presentation projector rather than a full theatrical model for digital. It's not church - especially with this rowdy group - but it's a place where you're going to see movies without a lot of bells & whistles, and I'm okay with that.

That's host Grady Hendrix, one of the founders of the New York Asian Film Festival whose Kaiju Shakedown column in Variety and Film Comment taught me a bunch about current Asian film and the context needed to understand it, and his column on Sammo Hung is an essential read, even if the links the the clips have been taken down since publishing it a year and a half ago. These days, he's also a horror writer pretty popular within his poppy niche. He also has a variety of very snazzy suits which makes him easy to spot if you've got questions about the event, or if you're just in a nearby pizza place, having a couple of slices and want to feel reassured that you haven't overstayed the dinner break.
I wound up zonking out a lot - I didn't make it through any of the movies without multiple instances of momentary passing out and then suddenly jerking back to consciousness - but this was one of those cases where the experience is just as important as the films, and not only was it fun, but it was neat to see a few of the folks I meet at Fantasia every summer midway between fests - not just Paul who co-founded NYAFF with Grady, but Kurt who came down from Toronto for a birthday weekend. He, by the way, flew into Newark without issue (heck, a 90-minute flight took 55) and had easy going getting in via the subway. So much envy.
Then it was off to the Port Authority to wait three hours to catch the bus back to Boston. Definitely something I'll be doing again next January if Grady makes this an annual thing, though I'm going to do it much smarter.
Chung ngon sat luk: O gei (Organized Crime & Triad Bureau)
* * ¾-ish (out of four)
Seen on 27 January 2018 in Anthology Film Archives (Hong-Kong-a-Thon, 35mm)
Soon after this movie, director Che-Kirk Wong would come to Hollywood, make The Big Hit, and apparently just drop off the map for a decade and a half. Not surprising, if that film and this one are both bonkers, careening over the top and out of control, filled with bad taste and violence. Soon, neither Hollywood nor Hong Kong would be looking for that kind of mania, and Wong apparently didn't have it in him to settle down and make stuff that could easily play mainland China or an America shifting more toward PG-13 blockbusters.
The movie itself leans into its crazy pretty quickly - Danny Lee Sau-yin plays the most renegade of renegade cops with the whole unit going along for the ride, like Wong and writer Lu Bing know the audience is down with this trope already and kind of just want to give them what they want without making too big a thing out of it. Wong's got a great knack for doing the reverse of what a lot of other directors would do in that while it's normal to skirt right on the edge of self-parody but always jump back, he's staying right over the line but able to jump back to "normal" in order to give the movie just a little bit of sanity. And, more than anything else, it's got Cecilia Yip Tung as Cindy, the villain's mistress, although it would be easy to assume she's his wife for much of the film despite a few lines of dialogue. She's a cheerfully competent villain but also a wonderfully loyal one, not Lady Macbeth but the terrific partner every gangster would want. It is, in fact, hard not to cheer for her; she easily outshines Anthony Wong Chau-sang as the nominal gangster in charge, and when all is said and done, it's her devotion and commitment that make this movie memorable, because we don't get characters like her in the average gangster movie.
Fong Sai Yuk (aka The Legend)
* * *-ish (out of four)
Seen on 27 January 2018 in Anthology Film Archives (Hong-Kong-a-Thon, 35mm)
I don't think Grady introduced Fong Sai Yuk with any sort of variation on "it will ____ your face off", which is just as well, because it actually happens and it's gross and not really indicative of what sort of movie this is. That it's not is kind of impressive, because this thing is already two movies mashed together in a kind of haphazard manner and neither of them are really face-ripping-off movies.
This one's at its best when it's a sort of kung fu bedroom farce with Jet Li a youth getting on the bad side of the rich new guy in town (Chen Sung-young) but falling for his daughter Ting-ting (Michelle Reis), whose hand in marriage has been promised to whoever can defeat her mother (Sibelle Hu) in a martial-arts challenge, which for some reason Sai-yuk's mother (Josephine Siao) enters as his brother, capturing the affection of her son's potential future mother-in-law… It's a goofy as heck story with kung fu that impresses in large part because it's slapstick fun and not lethal in the way it often is in Jet Li movies, and I suspect that only the spiritually dead don't want the two middle-aged women whose husbands don't really appreciate their eccentricity to wind up together. The thing is, it's connected to a story about an evil emperor and the secret society opposing him, and while director Corey Yuen and the writers do a pretty decent job sliding from one to the other, the best parts of the movie are the ones where nobody actually seems likely to get hurt. Even if it's more of a case of this starting out as a serious action movie that had enough comic relief injected to take over rather than an action-comedy given higher stakes than it needs, the funny stuff is the best and freshest material.
Fai seung dat yin (Expect the Unexpected)
* * ½-ish (out of four)
Seen on 27 January 2018 in Anthology Film Archives (Hong-Kong-a-Thon, 35mm)
I was half-in and half-out during bits of this movie, so maybe I missed something but… The big crime story with the plans to rob the Hong Kong Jockey Clubs, with nasty rapes and murders just to stake it out, never actually gets resolved, right? That's the whole wacky irony of the movie, that this really horrific thing is going on and the cops get too tied up in their own subplots and B-story to actually put a stop to it? If so, I can see why Expect the Unexpected supposedly received little love when it came out; it's the sort of satire that doesn't announce itself as parody and is close enough to the thing it's mocking - in this case, stylish Japanese ensemble dramas that were popular in Hong Kong at the time - that it can just seem like doing one badly.
On the other hand, looked at through that lens, there's something enjoyably skewed about it. Simon Yam and Lau Ching-wan have probably played these roles straight (both in hard-boiled cop dramas and lighter relationship-focused fare) that they can find the absurd border of the love triangle their cops share with a witness ("YoYo" Mung Ka-wai) and make each side convincing while highlighting what a goofy genre thing it being the focus is. Director Patrick Yau and his cast and crew do really impressive work sliding between tones and making each scene work as part of the side it's working, and when it does come time for the action to kick in, director Patrick Yau and action director Yuen Bun, working with producers Johnnie To and Wai Ka-fai, deliver some genuinely terrific over-the-top violence.
Does it work as a whole? I'm not sure, for more reasons than because I'm probably missing critical information on the plot. But as someone who has been known to snicker at movies who put relationship issues at the center of stories with life-and-death stakes, I kind of love the way this movie seems to both deliver and sneer at that convention at the same time.
(Huh, it's on Prime. May as well check it out un-fatigued!)
Yue doh laai yue ying hung (Cheap Killers)
* * ¼-ish (out of four)
Seen on 27 January 2018 in Anthology Film Archives (Hong-Kong-a-Thon, 35mm)
I swear, sometimes Hong Kong filmmakers just seem to be flipping coins a to whether a character survives an over-the-top action sequence or not, and Cheap Killers is the epitome of this; there were something like half a dozen times when something was set up as a potentially tragic moment and a character wound up with enough bullet/puncture wounds to ensure that, yeah, even in a crazy Hong Kong action movie, that guy's dead, and instead he's alive in the next scene (or several scenes later), maybe hobbling or wearing a cast, but still around. It is utter seeming randomness.
It's not necessarily random, but it's still messy enough that it's tough to figure out where writer/producer Wong Jing is trying to go with this movie other than trying to make it different from the several hundred other movies he's worked on. That, admittedly, is how you get hitman Sam Cool (Alex Fong Chung-sun) having a crush on his womanizing partner (Sunny Chan Kam-hung) only to have him fall for Ling (Kathy Chow Hoi-mei), the wife of a client (Ku Feng), who makes her way to the top of the crime world through some awfully impressive black widowing. That's a noir story, really, especially once you figure in the likable young would-be cop (Stephen Fung Tak-lun) who falls for Ling's teenage sister (Lillian Ha Ga-lee). There's ways to make it a serviceable big-time action movie, especially with what seems like a clear Miami Vice influence, but neither Wong nor director Clarence Ford really seems to be interested in that sort of nuance, leaving it all up to Alex Fong and Kathy Chow.
That lack of subtlety makes it work as a dumb/cheap grindhouse thing, though; it's unrelenting in its bloody violence and scenery-chewing villainy once the filmmakers have thrown their lot in with pulp, right down to the baddie trying to make an exit via helicopter at the end. High-minded, this movie is not, but it kind of works when concentrated on the lurid stuff.
Xin long zhong hu dou (Kickboxer's Tears)
* * ½-ish (out of four)
Seen on 27 January 2018 in Anthology Film Archives (Hong-Kong-a-Thon, 35mm)
I think I may have seen this one at a Coolidge Corner Midnight Ass-Kicking show but missed different parts of it; the opening pickpocketing scene seemed very familiar even though other parts seemed new. Maybe that opening bit was just lifted by another martial arts film that I did see (or vice versa).
Whatever the case, this was a pretty fun bait & switch on Grady's part in that he calls it a "girls with guns" movie and I don't think either Moon Lee Choi-fung's sweet nurse-practitioner Li Feng nor the surprisingly capable wife of the villain ever actually picks up a gun. Expecting the movie to go that way made it even more of a surprise when Feng suddenly breaks out the martial arts skills to rival her late brother's and just absolutely shreds a group of hooligans trying to mug her. She's a pixie who can get a surprising amount of leverage and do crazy things in mid-air, causing the audience's jaw to drop as a lot of big, musclebound guys struggle to keep up.
The fights choreographed by Siu Tak-foo are where most of the effort in the movie gets made, and even then, some of it can get dry - there's a long kickboxing match between Ken Lo Wai-kwong and Billy Chow Bei-lei that just starts getting good when Chow's trainers cheat so that Li Lung can die and Feng can have something to avenge. The script by writer/director Sam Daat-wai is just about entirely the standard outline, and the only moment that really stands out - Wilson Lam Jun-yin's abashed pickpocket admitting that the restaurant where they're eating is shabby because he didn't actually have a plan for when Feng said yes - tends to highlight the movie's cheapness. But the action is good enough to stand on its own, so it delivers the important stuff.
Mong ming yuen yeung (On the Run)
* * *-ish (out of four)
Seen on 27 January 2018 in Anthology Film Archives (Hong-Kong-a-Thon, 35mm)
Out of all the movies I saw this Saturday, this is the one I'm keenest to see again. It's got a plot that is just convoluted enough to be worth paying attention to, a bleak word-view that is very much informed by how, in the late 1980s, anybody with the means to establish residency outside of Hong Kong before the handover to China was looking to do so, and a trio of charismatic stars. There's Yuen Biao, not doing any martial arts but proving fairly capable as a cop looking at being left behind even before he's framed for the murder of his ex-wife. There's Charlie Chin Chiang-lin as the sneering, corrupt lover of said ex-wife who knows that the party is about to be over and just doesn't understand why anybody is bothering with attempted honesty. And there's Pat Ha Man-jik as the assassin in the middle.
Ms. Ha, we were told between the film, isn't someone most of the audience would be familiar with because she wasn't really an action star; she spent her time doing dramas (and television?), and you can sort of see how maybe she's out of place; Chui is a young woman who dresses in cute, stylish outfits and is friendly without it seeming like some kind of put-on mask. She's the themed killer who gets added to an action movie for color and doesn't seem to belong at the center where the contradictions that make her fun in small doses cause the whole structure to break down unless it's about examining her. On the Run isn't really that sort of movie, but Ha makes it work anyway, taking good care of the humanity that the screenplay by director Alfred Cheung Kin-ting and Keith Wong Wang-gei allows her but never letting the professionalism slip; she works in both the darker places and the lighter ones without making a joke of it.
The movie spends a lot of time in those dark places, doling out some awfully cruel ends and giving its shootouts a dangerous recklessness that seldom gets silly even as the violence escalates. Like Cheap Killers, it's the sort of movie where survival seems to be as much the result of caprice as logic or what works thematically, with the last act going all-in on that randomness without really leveraging it to get the maximum emotional impact from how people react to all those bullets flying around. The finale still packs a punch, especially as the end of the event: Though it's actually one of the older movies on the six-film schedule, its embrace of people fleeing the handover and the scorched-earth policy on the way out certainly works as a reminder that Hong Kong isn't the same place with the same hyper-productive movie industry that it used to be, which is why we don't really see the likes of these films any more.
See, my plan was to take the 2:15am bus out of South Station, arrive at 9am, meet my brother Matt (visiting from Chicago) for brunch, and then mosey on over to the Anthology Film Archive and get there early enough to find myself a good seat. And it looked like things might go even easier, as I got there just after midnight, and there was a 1am bus. They actually let me on before it turned out the bus was sold out and I had to get off. But, hey, easy come, easy go. At least, until 2:15 comes and there's no driver. We're told the driver won't be there until four. That's our 10am brunch gone. Soon, it's five, I'm eying other lines (Megabus had a 6am departure but I couldn't find it on the site), they're saying any moment now, but I'm adding the 6.75 hours that the local takes thinking that would cut it close. I can't get them to switch me to the 6:30 local, which is sold out, but can get on the 6:45. It's a local that gets into George Washington Bridge terminal at 11 (instead of the usual Port Authority), which only has an A-line subways stop. I just miss it, it's fifteen minutes until the next one (less learned - you don't necessarily really need to pee), and then the train is slow, the stations are confusing, and the upshot is, I get to the AFA at 12:45 for a 12:30 show.

It's an unassuming building, a former courthouse without a concession stand and two screens, with the second presumably hidden somewhere behind the box office on the first floor. It reminds me of the Harvard Film Archive, not just because of the name and rules against snacks, but because it's got a fairly academic bent even though there's room for fun. The room is also pretty basic - it seats 208 because the rows are close together and the seats are not as wide as they could be, and a few quick glances up to the booth showed paired 35mm projectors and what looks like a presentation projector rather than a full theatrical model for digital. It's not church - especially with this rowdy group - but it's a place where you're going to see movies without a lot of bells & whistles, and I'm okay with that.

That's host Grady Hendrix, one of the founders of the New York Asian Film Festival whose Kaiju Shakedown column in Variety and Film Comment taught me a bunch about current Asian film and the context needed to understand it, and his column on Sammo Hung is an essential read, even if the links the the clips have been taken down since publishing it a year and a half ago. These days, he's also a horror writer pretty popular within his poppy niche. He also has a variety of very snazzy suits which makes him easy to spot if you've got questions about the event, or if you're just in a nearby pizza place, having a couple of slices and want to feel reassured that you haven't overstayed the dinner break.
I wound up zonking out a lot - I didn't make it through any of the movies without multiple instances of momentary passing out and then suddenly jerking back to consciousness - but this was one of those cases where the experience is just as important as the films, and not only was it fun, but it was neat to see a few of the folks I meet at Fantasia every summer midway between fests - not just Paul who co-founded NYAFF with Grady, but Kurt who came down from Toronto for a birthday weekend. He, by the way, flew into Newark without issue (heck, a 90-minute flight took 55) and had easy going getting in via the subway. So much envy.
Then it was off to the Port Authority to wait three hours to catch the bus back to Boston. Definitely something I'll be doing again next January if Grady makes this an annual thing, though I'm going to do it much smarter.
Chung ngon sat luk: O gei (Organized Crime & Triad Bureau)
* * ¾-ish (out of four)
Seen on 27 January 2018 in Anthology Film Archives (Hong-Kong-a-Thon, 35mm)
Soon after this movie, director Che-Kirk Wong would come to Hollywood, make The Big Hit, and apparently just drop off the map for a decade and a half. Not surprising, if that film and this one are both bonkers, careening over the top and out of control, filled with bad taste and violence. Soon, neither Hollywood nor Hong Kong would be looking for that kind of mania, and Wong apparently didn't have it in him to settle down and make stuff that could easily play mainland China or an America shifting more toward PG-13 blockbusters.
The movie itself leans into its crazy pretty quickly - Danny Lee Sau-yin plays the most renegade of renegade cops with the whole unit going along for the ride, like Wong and writer Lu Bing know the audience is down with this trope already and kind of just want to give them what they want without making too big a thing out of it. Wong's got a great knack for doing the reverse of what a lot of other directors would do in that while it's normal to skirt right on the edge of self-parody but always jump back, he's staying right over the line but able to jump back to "normal" in order to give the movie just a little bit of sanity. And, more than anything else, it's got Cecilia Yip Tung as Cindy, the villain's mistress, although it would be easy to assume she's his wife for much of the film despite a few lines of dialogue. She's a cheerfully competent villain but also a wonderfully loyal one, not Lady Macbeth but the terrific partner every gangster would want. It is, in fact, hard not to cheer for her; she easily outshines Anthony Wong Chau-sang as the nominal gangster in charge, and when all is said and done, it's her devotion and commitment that make this movie memorable, because we don't get characters like her in the average gangster movie.
Fong Sai Yuk (aka The Legend)
* * *-ish (out of four)
Seen on 27 January 2018 in Anthology Film Archives (Hong-Kong-a-Thon, 35mm)
I don't think Grady introduced Fong Sai Yuk with any sort of variation on "it will ____ your face off", which is just as well, because it actually happens and it's gross and not really indicative of what sort of movie this is. That it's not is kind of impressive, because this thing is already two movies mashed together in a kind of haphazard manner and neither of them are really face-ripping-off movies.
This one's at its best when it's a sort of kung fu bedroom farce with Jet Li a youth getting on the bad side of the rich new guy in town (Chen Sung-young) but falling for his daughter Ting-ting (Michelle Reis), whose hand in marriage has been promised to whoever can defeat her mother (Sibelle Hu) in a martial-arts challenge, which for some reason Sai-yuk's mother (Josephine Siao) enters as his brother, capturing the affection of her son's potential future mother-in-law… It's a goofy as heck story with kung fu that impresses in large part because it's slapstick fun and not lethal in the way it often is in Jet Li movies, and I suspect that only the spiritually dead don't want the two middle-aged women whose husbands don't really appreciate their eccentricity to wind up together. The thing is, it's connected to a story about an evil emperor and the secret society opposing him, and while director Corey Yuen and the writers do a pretty decent job sliding from one to the other, the best parts of the movie are the ones where nobody actually seems likely to get hurt. Even if it's more of a case of this starting out as a serious action movie that had enough comic relief injected to take over rather than an action-comedy given higher stakes than it needs, the funny stuff is the best and freshest material.
Fai seung dat yin (Expect the Unexpected)
* * ½-ish (out of four)
Seen on 27 January 2018 in Anthology Film Archives (Hong-Kong-a-Thon, 35mm)
I was half-in and half-out during bits of this movie, so maybe I missed something but… The big crime story with the plans to rob the Hong Kong Jockey Clubs, with nasty rapes and murders just to stake it out, never actually gets resolved, right? That's the whole wacky irony of the movie, that this really horrific thing is going on and the cops get too tied up in their own subplots and B-story to actually put a stop to it? If so, I can see why Expect the Unexpected supposedly received little love when it came out; it's the sort of satire that doesn't announce itself as parody and is close enough to the thing it's mocking - in this case, stylish Japanese ensemble dramas that were popular in Hong Kong at the time - that it can just seem like doing one badly.
On the other hand, looked at through that lens, there's something enjoyably skewed about it. Simon Yam and Lau Ching-wan have probably played these roles straight (both in hard-boiled cop dramas and lighter relationship-focused fare) that they can find the absurd border of the love triangle their cops share with a witness ("YoYo" Mung Ka-wai) and make each side convincing while highlighting what a goofy genre thing it being the focus is. Director Patrick Yau and his cast and crew do really impressive work sliding between tones and making each scene work as part of the side it's working, and when it does come time for the action to kick in, director Patrick Yau and action director Yuen Bun, working with producers Johnnie To and Wai Ka-fai, deliver some genuinely terrific over-the-top violence.
Does it work as a whole? I'm not sure, for more reasons than because I'm probably missing critical information on the plot. But as someone who has been known to snicker at movies who put relationship issues at the center of stories with life-and-death stakes, I kind of love the way this movie seems to both deliver and sneer at that convention at the same time.
(Huh, it's on Prime. May as well check it out un-fatigued!)
Yue doh laai yue ying hung (Cheap Killers)
* * ¼-ish (out of four)
Seen on 27 January 2018 in Anthology Film Archives (Hong-Kong-a-Thon, 35mm)
I swear, sometimes Hong Kong filmmakers just seem to be flipping coins a to whether a character survives an over-the-top action sequence or not, and Cheap Killers is the epitome of this; there were something like half a dozen times when something was set up as a potentially tragic moment and a character wound up with enough bullet/puncture wounds to ensure that, yeah, even in a crazy Hong Kong action movie, that guy's dead, and instead he's alive in the next scene (or several scenes later), maybe hobbling or wearing a cast, but still around. It is utter seeming randomness.
It's not necessarily random, but it's still messy enough that it's tough to figure out where writer/producer Wong Jing is trying to go with this movie other than trying to make it different from the several hundred other movies he's worked on. That, admittedly, is how you get hitman Sam Cool (Alex Fong Chung-sun) having a crush on his womanizing partner (Sunny Chan Kam-hung) only to have him fall for Ling (Kathy Chow Hoi-mei), the wife of a client (Ku Feng), who makes her way to the top of the crime world through some awfully impressive black widowing. That's a noir story, really, especially once you figure in the likable young would-be cop (Stephen Fung Tak-lun) who falls for Ling's teenage sister (Lillian Ha Ga-lee). There's ways to make it a serviceable big-time action movie, especially with what seems like a clear Miami Vice influence, but neither Wong nor director Clarence Ford really seems to be interested in that sort of nuance, leaving it all up to Alex Fong and Kathy Chow.
That lack of subtlety makes it work as a dumb/cheap grindhouse thing, though; it's unrelenting in its bloody violence and scenery-chewing villainy once the filmmakers have thrown their lot in with pulp, right down to the baddie trying to make an exit via helicopter at the end. High-minded, this movie is not, but it kind of works when concentrated on the lurid stuff.
Xin long zhong hu dou (Kickboxer's Tears)
* * ½-ish (out of four)
Seen on 27 January 2018 in Anthology Film Archives (Hong-Kong-a-Thon, 35mm)
I think I may have seen this one at a Coolidge Corner Midnight Ass-Kicking show but missed different parts of it; the opening pickpocketing scene seemed very familiar even though other parts seemed new. Maybe that opening bit was just lifted by another martial arts film that I did see (or vice versa).
Whatever the case, this was a pretty fun bait & switch on Grady's part in that he calls it a "girls with guns" movie and I don't think either Moon Lee Choi-fung's sweet nurse-practitioner Li Feng nor the surprisingly capable wife of the villain ever actually picks up a gun. Expecting the movie to go that way made it even more of a surprise when Feng suddenly breaks out the martial arts skills to rival her late brother's and just absolutely shreds a group of hooligans trying to mug her. She's a pixie who can get a surprising amount of leverage and do crazy things in mid-air, causing the audience's jaw to drop as a lot of big, musclebound guys struggle to keep up.
The fights choreographed by Siu Tak-foo are where most of the effort in the movie gets made, and even then, some of it can get dry - there's a long kickboxing match between Ken Lo Wai-kwong and Billy Chow Bei-lei that just starts getting good when Chow's trainers cheat so that Li Lung can die and Feng can have something to avenge. The script by writer/director Sam Daat-wai is just about entirely the standard outline, and the only moment that really stands out - Wilson Lam Jun-yin's abashed pickpocket admitting that the restaurant where they're eating is shabby because he didn't actually have a plan for when Feng said yes - tends to highlight the movie's cheapness. But the action is good enough to stand on its own, so it delivers the important stuff.
Mong ming yuen yeung (On the Run)
* * *-ish (out of four)
Seen on 27 January 2018 in Anthology Film Archives (Hong-Kong-a-Thon, 35mm)
Out of all the movies I saw this Saturday, this is the one I'm keenest to see again. It's got a plot that is just convoluted enough to be worth paying attention to, a bleak word-view that is very much informed by how, in the late 1980s, anybody with the means to establish residency outside of Hong Kong before the handover to China was looking to do so, and a trio of charismatic stars. There's Yuen Biao, not doing any martial arts but proving fairly capable as a cop looking at being left behind even before he's framed for the murder of his ex-wife. There's Charlie Chin Chiang-lin as the sneering, corrupt lover of said ex-wife who knows that the party is about to be over and just doesn't understand why anybody is bothering with attempted honesty. And there's Pat Ha Man-jik as the assassin in the middle.
Ms. Ha, we were told between the film, isn't someone most of the audience would be familiar with because she wasn't really an action star; she spent her time doing dramas (and television?), and you can sort of see how maybe she's out of place; Chui is a young woman who dresses in cute, stylish outfits and is friendly without it seeming like some kind of put-on mask. She's the themed killer who gets added to an action movie for color and doesn't seem to belong at the center where the contradictions that make her fun in small doses cause the whole structure to break down unless it's about examining her. On the Run isn't really that sort of movie, but Ha makes it work anyway, taking good care of the humanity that the screenplay by director Alfred Cheung Kin-ting and Keith Wong Wang-gei allows her but never letting the professionalism slip; she works in both the darker places and the lighter ones without making a joke of it.
The movie spends a lot of time in those dark places, doling out some awfully cruel ends and giving its shootouts a dangerous recklessness that seldom gets silly even as the violence escalates. Like Cheap Killers, it's the sort of movie where survival seems to be as much the result of caprice as logic or what works thematically, with the last act going all-in on that randomness without really leveraging it to get the maximum emotional impact from how people react to all those bullets flying around. The finale still packs a punch, especially as the end of the event: Though it's actually one of the older movies on the six-film schedule, its embrace of people fleeing the handover and the scorched-earth policy on the way out certainly works as a reminder that Hong Kong isn't the same place with the same hyper-productive movie industry that it used to be, which is why we don't really see the likes of these films any more.
Sunday, October 29, 2017
Suburbicon
I kind of wonder what the timeline on this movie is, because between it and Gambit, I'm kind of wondering if the films that the Coen Brothers write but don't direct are initially developed for themselves, handed off to someone else when they can't get it to work (because, hey, might as well get paid for the effort even if it feels like a dead end), and then made into disappointing movies because, as good as George Clooney and writing/producing partner Grant Heslov are, they're not brilliant like the project's originators are, and probably don't have a different-enough perspective to make it work when the genuine geniuses couldn't.
Of course, they're talented enough that they don't really screw things up, but it really feels like they're working backwards at times - they've got the pretty fun third act, with Oscar Isaac and the escalating violence, and they need to get there, and never really fill in enough of the story to make it worth it.
This wasn't even my actual plan for the afternoon - I was going to see the animated film from Japan - but the MBTA's continuing use of shuttles because the Longfellow Bridge is still being rebuilt was even slower than usual this week, because there's apparently another section of the subway that needed shuttle buses this weekend too, and they got the actual MBTA buses and drivers and the middle of the Red Line got the charter buses that really don't fit a lot of people for their size and staff who maybe aren't quite as used to moving a lot of people around as the public transport specialists are. So I missed the start of my movie, bought tickets for this, and wound up with a bunch of seniors around me.
I've covered this material before, but for all people complain about millennials and teenagers always pulling out their phones or talking during movies, I always have worse luck with boomers, who just chat constantly, especially during a film set during their youth, giving them lots of chances to say "I remember that" while they're whispering about what they figure is going to happen in a not terribly tricky thriller. Just a constant nuisance though only worth hissing "be quiet" to once or twice.
But, still, it's worth remembering - people of all ages can be terrible at the movies; it's not just the people younger than oneself. And, come to think of that, isn't that sort of an appropriate thing to accompany a movie about how the good old days weren't that good?
Suburbicon
* * ¼ (out of four)
Seen 28 October 2017 in AMC Boston Common #17 (first-run, DCP)
They didn't mention race much in the trailer for Suburbicon, or give much attention to the kid who resides closest to the center of the movie, and while keeping something in reserve isn't necessarily a bad thing, it's also kind of something that happens with the movie itself, in that director George Clooney never really gets into the good, meaty stuff.
The film opens with a sly comment on integration that quickly gets pointed, as an animated sales pitch for the titular town touts its diversity with lily-white families from all across the country, only to freak out when the African-American Mayers clan buys a house there, leading to freakouts and alarmed town meetings. Their backyard abuts that of the Lodge family - father Gardner (Matt Damon), mother Rose (Julianne Moore), and son Nicky (Noah Jupe) - and Rose's sister Margaret (Moore) prods Noah to go play with his new neighbor Andy (Tony Espinosa). A few nights later, two men break into the Lodge house, knocking the entire family out with chloroform - something the already-disabled Rose cannot handle. It's a weird crime, and just gets weirder the closer anyone looks.
Not that there's a lot there; the mystery storyline is both exactly what it looks like from the start and missing a few details that might make it memorable. There's a number of things about the set-up that seem like they'd be really nifty if fleshed out - Margaret is a mass of potential contradictions while Gardner is presented as so generic that it's tough to get a handle on what he wants, with the filmmakers seeming to have little interest in what's in his head once they've done the jokes about everyone offering him the same platitudes. It's a story that only really comes to life when it gets weird or derailed by truly random events, although the basic material is strong enough to work regardless.
Full review on EFC.
Of course, they're talented enough that they don't really screw things up, but it really feels like they're working backwards at times - they've got the pretty fun third act, with Oscar Isaac and the escalating violence, and they need to get there, and never really fill in enough of the story to make it worth it.
This wasn't even my actual plan for the afternoon - I was going to see the animated film from Japan - but the MBTA's continuing use of shuttles because the Longfellow Bridge is still being rebuilt was even slower than usual this week, because there's apparently another section of the subway that needed shuttle buses this weekend too, and they got the actual MBTA buses and drivers and the middle of the Red Line got the charter buses that really don't fit a lot of people for their size and staff who maybe aren't quite as used to moving a lot of people around as the public transport specialists are. So I missed the start of my movie, bought tickets for this, and wound up with a bunch of seniors around me.
I've covered this material before, but for all people complain about millennials and teenagers always pulling out their phones or talking during movies, I always have worse luck with boomers, who just chat constantly, especially during a film set during their youth, giving them lots of chances to say "I remember that" while they're whispering about what they figure is going to happen in a not terribly tricky thriller. Just a constant nuisance though only worth hissing "be quiet" to once or twice.
But, still, it's worth remembering - people of all ages can be terrible at the movies; it's not just the people younger than oneself. And, come to think of that, isn't that sort of an appropriate thing to accompany a movie about how the good old days weren't that good?
Suburbicon
* * ¼ (out of four)
Seen 28 October 2017 in AMC Boston Common #17 (first-run, DCP)
They didn't mention race much in the trailer for Suburbicon, or give much attention to the kid who resides closest to the center of the movie, and while keeping something in reserve isn't necessarily a bad thing, it's also kind of something that happens with the movie itself, in that director George Clooney never really gets into the good, meaty stuff.
The film opens with a sly comment on integration that quickly gets pointed, as an animated sales pitch for the titular town touts its diversity with lily-white families from all across the country, only to freak out when the African-American Mayers clan buys a house there, leading to freakouts and alarmed town meetings. Their backyard abuts that of the Lodge family - father Gardner (Matt Damon), mother Rose (Julianne Moore), and son Nicky (Noah Jupe) - and Rose's sister Margaret (Moore) prods Noah to go play with his new neighbor Andy (Tony Espinosa). A few nights later, two men break into the Lodge house, knocking the entire family out with chloroform - something the already-disabled Rose cannot handle. It's a weird crime, and just gets weirder the closer anyone looks.
Not that there's a lot there; the mystery storyline is both exactly what it looks like from the start and missing a few details that might make it memorable. There's a number of things about the set-up that seem like they'd be really nifty if fleshed out - Margaret is a mass of potential contradictions while Gardner is presented as so generic that it's tough to get a handle on what he wants, with the filmmakers seeming to have little interest in what's in his head once they've done the jokes about everyone offering him the same platitudes. It's a story that only really comes to life when it gets weird or derailed by truly random events, although the basic material is strong enough to work regardless.
Full review on EFC.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)