Showing posts with label Gathr. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gathr. Show all posts

Friday, May 23, 2014

Next Week in Tickets: Films playing Boston 23 May 2014 - 29 May 2014

I could be watching movies over the long weekend, but I'll probably be going a hundred miles out of my way to help my brother move because it's the only chance I'll have to see another brother for months. (Shakes fist at sky)

  • So, I probably won't see X-Men: Days of Future Past until early next week. That's okay; it should play a while, and the ambition is impressive, merging the casts of both the first three X-movies and the pretty darn good First Class to adapt a time travel story that is one of the most popular from the seminal Chris Claremont & John Byrne run. It's playing in both 2D & 3D, and I seem to recall that director Bryan Singer used the third dimension pretty well in Jack the Giant Slayer. It's at the Capitol, Apple, Embassy, Boston Common, Fenway, and Assembly Square.

    The other big opening is Blended, with Adam Sandler and Drew Barrymore once again paired in a romantic comedy that, well, looks less awful than the words "Adam Sandler" might indicate. It's at the Capitol, Apple, Embassy, Boston Common, Fenway, Assembly Square, and the SuperLux.

    In better news, Chef is expanding this weekend, adding the Somerville Theatre, West Newton Cinema, and Fenway to its bookings at Boston Common and Kendall Square. It's great and you should see it.
  • Surprisingly, the week's big Indian release is not playing at Apple, but at Fenway: Kochadaiiyaan, a 3D motion-capture film featuring southern India's biggest star, Rajinikanth, in a historical epic that also features Deepika Padukone. I won't lie to you: A digitally animated Tamil historical action/adventure musical is a thing that sounds crazy enough that I will go see it even if it lacks English subtitles. Apple Cinemas & iMovieCafe will instead be opening up Telugu-language comedy Manam, which I believe also lacks subs.
  • The Coolidge (along with Kendall Square and West Newton) opens The Immigrant on its main screen, a pretty well-made movie starring Marion Cotillard as a Polish immigrant to the US in 1921 who encounters an intense Joaquin Phoenix and a charming Jeremy Renner.

    Also on the main screen: Friday/Saturday midnight showings of Werner Herzog's remake of Nosferatu the Vampyre, which is as nuts as you'd expect a Herzog vampire movie with Klaus Kinski in the title role to be. There's also a "Cinema Jukebox" screening of Dirty Dancing on Monday night
  • In addition to The Immigrant, Kendall Square opens Cold In July, the latest movie from director Jim Mickle and co-writer Nick Damici, who haven't made a bad movie yet. Heck, I'm not sure they've made oen that's less than great, and folks do love this adaptation of Joe R. Lansdale's crime novel with Michael C. Hall, sam Shepard, and Don Johnson.

    The one-week booking is documentary Teenage, in which director Matt Wolf examines how the idea of the teenager really created itself during the twentieth century. Kendall also picks up God's Pocket for two shows a day (it basically moves over from the Embassy), and has Friday & Saturday midnight showings of Back to the Future (and I don't want to complain too much that their midnights are the same ones everyone books, but it's also playing at Boston Common on Wednesday afternoon/evening).
  • The Brattle celebrates 100 years of The Little Tramp with a week of Charlie Chaplin silents, including new restorations of the short films he made at Keysstone (Friday & Saturday) and Mutual (Saturday & Monday). Those are digital, but the features - The Kid (Friday), City Lights (Sunday), The Circus (Sunday), Modern Times (Monday & Tuesday), and The Gold Rush (Tuesday) - are all 35mm. The whole series is double features, although the place is closed on Wednesday & Thursday.
  • The Harvard Film Archive has more Kenji Mizoguchi, including Sansho the Bailiff (Friday & Sunday), likely his most famous film; Hometown (Friday), his first sound picture; The Story of the Last Chrysanthemums (Sunday); and White Threads of the Waterfall, a silent that will play with a benshi soundtrack. There will be a quick break from Mizoguchi on Saturday for two by Frank Capra - silent The Matinee Idol at 7pm and Mr. Deeds Goes to Town at 9pm. All are in 35mm except White Threads, which is 16mm
  • The Museum of Fine Arts wraps up The Boston International Children's Film Festival with Patema Inverted from Friday to Sunday, which looks like an anime version of Upside Down, "Shorts for Tots" on Saturday, Miniscule: Valley of the Lost Ants on Saturday & Sunday, and one last screening of Jack and the Cuckoo Clock Heart on Sunday. The Technicolor Musicals program also continues with A Star Is Born (Friday), West Side Story (Wednesday), and An American in Paris (Thursday).
  • The ICA screens Jellyfish Eyes and The New England Animation Film Festival program once each on Sunday and Monday; the former is included with museum admission
  • The Regent Theatre has two film events this week: The 5h Annual Ciclismo Classico Bike Travel Film Fest plays Wednesday, with tickets to this collection of short films about bicycle-based tourism entered in a draw for a trip to Italy. Next Goal Wins, a fun documentary about the hapless American Samoa national soccer team trying to gain respectability, plays Thursday.
  • That's a Gathr screening, and it's worth noting that they do have a few upcoming bookings around the area, including Kids for Cash at Fenway on Thursday. The other theatrical-on-demand service, Tugg, actually seems to have sold a screening of some Ghost in the Shell episodes out while I wasn't looking, with the next event, 3D Imax dance concert movie Under the Electric Sky, scheduled for 5 June at Boston Common if 32 more people reserve tickets in the next week.
  • It's also about time to start paying attention to free outdoor screenings (check Joe's Calendar), as Beetlejuice will be showing outside Bloc 11 Cafe in Somerville on Monday.


My plans? It's just not going to be possible to fit Sansho the Bailiff, Kochadaiiyaan, and Cold in July in before heading north, is it? Well, I'm looking at those three and X-Men, maybe some Mizoguchi & Chaplin, and I still haven't seen Neighbors yet.

Sunday, March 30, 2014

This Week In Tickets: 17 March 2014 - 23 March 2014

Quiet week, what with being busy at work and having a good chunk of my weekend claimed.

This Week in Tickets

Not particularly complaining, mind you: There have been weeks at work when I have worried I'm not doing enough to be kept on, and the weekend was a chance to see a whole bunch of my immediate and extended family, if the reason for it is because my youngest brother and his wife are moving to Chicago for a new adventure and everybody who lives in the area is looking to wish them well. I won't lie - even though I didn't see Matt & Morgan as often as I'd like given that we can get to each others' houses with one bus line and a bit of a walk, it's going to be kind of different not having them nearby.

So, that made for a quiet movie-going week. I went to the Belmont World Film series to catch Ilo Ilo on Monday, which was kind of weird at first for much the same reason that the previous week's trip to West Newton was (the first leg of the trip out there was, once upon a time, my commute to work), but it was neat to visit the Studio Cinema in Belmont and catch a pretty decent film from Singapore.

Because the send-off party was at another brother's in Maine, it ate a bunch of the weekend, so I had to schedule my movie-going around that. That meant catching both Particle Fever and Grand Piano on Friday night, but those were both good choices: The former is as inviting a documentary on searching for the Higgs Boson as you're going to get (and, happily, still playing in Boston), while the latter is a thriller with a ridiculous premise that does a much better job than you might expect in using how unusual it is to the film's advantage.

After that, I went to Maine and spent some time verifying that my nieces are the cutest nieces as well as seeing all my brothers, many cousins, et al. On the way, we stopped at this place in the New Hampshire border, because Matt really likes pinball. I did manage to clean his clock at Burgertime, though.

I got back home just in time to head out to Arlington for what turned out to be the last in the Gathr Preview Series, Hide Your Smiling Faces. Pretty good way to go out, though it's a shame it was never able to get much traction.

Up next: The Boston Underground Film Festival.

Ilo IloParticle FeverGrand PianoHide Your Smiling Faces

Saturday, March 29, 2014

Gathr Previews: Hide Your Smiling Faces

I must admit... I was kind of surprised to be greeted at the screening for Hide Your Smiling Faces with a comment about how I was there for the last hurrah, if only because they had charged my credit card for another three months of membership just the week before. Apparently, the decision to shut the series down happened quickly - there's still a page for it on Gathr's website, and TBD listings for four screenings, including one tomorrow. A representative was still coming to screenings and offering memberships just a few weeks ago.

It's not surprising, though - I have been the only person at some of these screenings, and only a few times has the crowd been able to pack the Underground, much less the actual Regent Theatre. I can only guess why it didn't work out in Arlington - for one, it's in Arlington, and for many in the Boston area, that's the wrong direction to ask many people to travel for an evening's entertainment after work; for another, there seemed to be very little attempt to reach out to the various groups that might be interested in seeing independent movies early (or, in many cases, in the only theatrical screening they'd get) in the Boston area. I presume that the other twelve or thirteen venues had similar situations and turnouts, which is a shame. There were some duds among the movies shown, but some very good ones as well.

Supposedly, they are looking at reviving the series in the fall, possibly on a different schedule than weekly. I'll miss it, but I'm kind of shocked it survived this long.

Hide Your Smiling Faces

* * * ½ (out of four)
Seen 23 March 2014 in the Regent Theatre (Gathr Previews, digital)

Dead things appear early on in Hide Your Smiling Faces, as three kids poking around an abandoned building find a dead bird and do not exactly treat it with respect. It's a good starting point for writer/director Daniel Patrick Carbone's first feature, a fine look at rural kids confronting mortality.

Those three kids are Eric (Nathan Varnson), his younger brother Tommy (Ryan Jones), and Tommy's best friend Ian (Ivan Tomic). It's summer vacation, they're old enough not to need a whole lot of parental supervision, although you can argue whether that's a good or bad thing when Ian shows the brothers his father's pistol. The man chases Tommy and Eric away, and a few days later, Eric and his friend Tristan (Thomas Cruz) find Ian's body.

This could be the start of a mystery story, and maybe something like that is going on behind the scenes, but Carbone keeps the focus clearly on the kids' perspective, so if there's talk of an investigation, it's not filtering down to that level. Instead, the fact of Ian's absence takes the focus rather than the circumstances, and in some ways it seems to be affecting Eric more than Tommy. Part of that may just be the fact that Eric has Tristan to play off, and a story that goes in an interesting direction there. For the most part, summer goes on, but there's a pall, and added significance to everything from learning to swim to the mean neighbor threatening their dog.

Full review at EFC

Tuesday, March 04, 2014

Gathr Previews: Next Goal Wins, The Forgotten Kingdom, On My Way

I missed one Gathr preview series during the sci-fi festival, and I was actually kind of disappointed about that one; Adult World with John Cusack, Emma Roberts, and Cloris Leachman looked like it could be entertaining. On the other hand, that was the night of Bunker 6 at the festival, and that was one of the best, so I'm guessing that in the duel of Things I Had Prepaid For was won by the proper presentation.

The next week was an interesting one - I had done the 24-hour marathon from noon Sunday to noon Monday, and spent the afternoon kind of woozy, although I was able to pick up a second wind in time for Next Goal Wins. Fun little movie, although it was kind of amusing that the Regent guys filled as many seats as they could by contacting local youth soccer programs and seeing if they'd be interested - only to be a little surprised at all the swearing Thomas Rongen and the other coaches did. On the bright side, I didn't hear anybody complaining about the transgendered player who figures prominently in the documentary, so that was good.

The 24th was my first time in the new "Regent Underground Theatre", which is part of the Dance Inn next to the main theater. It's an odd little space, next to the rehearsal area, with folding chairs and café tables set up ahead of a stage area with the screen in the back. It says something, I suppose, that seeing a movie there feels genuinely unusual, what with the open area to the left and obvious evidence that it's not purpose-built for this function; not so very long ago, movies like The Forgotten Kingdom would have been exclusively shown in places like that, or wherever a film club could set up a screen and a 16mm projector. Now we go to something like that and ponder whether paying $10 for the experience is a good value in comparison to paying roughly the same amount to rent it as a new release on Video On Demand or via Amazon Instant Video.

It was back upstairs yesterday for On My Way, with folks from Belmont World Film handing out programs for their upcoming series, which I thought was kind of odd, as that one is also scheduled for Mondays, albeit over at the Studio Cinema in Belmont. It turns out that won't be the case; instead, the Gathr Previews Bookings look to be shuffled to Sunday through the length of that series. It looks like it's going to be really tight for Tiger Tail in Blue this week - the theater is booked until 8pm, so the movie will be starting at 8:15 - although it will be back to the regular 7:30pm time for The Raid 2: Berandal on the 16th.

I'm a bit of two minds about this - on the one hand, this makes it a bit more difficult for me to get there, as I'll be trying to fit it into my weekend rather than hopping off the 350 bus early, but I suspect that it might be more enticing for the people who don't go directly past this theater on public transportation every day. Gripping hand is that it does get this away from the other Monday-evening programs, whether in Belmont or at the Coolidge.

At any rate, this is proving to be a fairly resilient series, and it does seem to be starting to gather regulars aside from me. It also seems to be getting some slightly better movies right now - there was a pretty barren period late last year, but I am kind of excited about The Raid 2 - which can only help going forward.

Next Goal Wins

* * * (out of four)
Seen 17 February 2014 in the Regent Theartre (Gathr Preview Series, digital)

Next Goal Wins is an inspirational sports story that follows a familiar enough template that if it were fictional, we might be tempted to roll our eyes at just how far the filmmakers were pushing it. This kind of extreme-underdog story does occasionally happen, though, and one of the great things about sport is the way that it occasionally serves this kind of story up. The story of American Samoa's national team is a button-pushing crowd-pleaser, sure, but it's a darn good one.

The American Samoan side, you see, was infamously bad at soccer. They were 0-32 in FIFA-sanctioned matches, with the most infamous loss coming in 2001, when they lost to Australia 31-0, an absurd score for a game where the point totals are usually in the low single digits. The film picks up ten years later, with a volunteer coach attempting to lead this team of amateurs in their first international competition in for years. When that doesn't go so well, they turn to help from the US Soccer Association, which helps them hire fiery Dutch coach Thomas Rongen, who helps recruit Samoan-American Rawlston Masantai & soldier Ramin Ott to join captain Liatama Amisone Jr., Jaiyah "Johnny" Saelua, and redemption-seeking goalkeeper Nicky Salapu.

It's easy to forget just how difficult sports can be at the highest levels, not just for spectators but for the coaches. There are a ton of laughs to be found in how both Rongen and volunteer coach Larry Mena'o react with mounting levels of frustration and profanity, not having realized just how far below their expectations a national team could fall (amusingly, the parents who brought their young soccer-playing kids to the screening I attended did not anticipate the amount of swearing involved). It's what makes Salapu kind of a fascinating story; he's probably the best player in his Seattle rec league, for example, and during the clips of various matches, the commentators almost seem sorry for him, implying he's a good keeper who is not helped by a porous defense or being just a cut below the pro-quality guys he's facing. It helps firmly establish what a lot of sports movies can't, that just making a respectable show against some of these other teams is in some ways just as good as a victory.

Full review at EFC

The Forgotten Kingdom

* * ¾ (out of four)
Seen 24 February 2014 in the Regent Theartre Underground (Gathr Preview Series, digital)

Anybody who has ever owned a globe or a world map has probably found himself or herself curious about Lesotho; the small landlocked kingdom in the middle of South Africa is one of only two or three nations in the world to be completely encircled by another. And while director Andrew Mudge's new film set there doesn't necessarily give much insight on how that geography affects life there, it's still a fine, intimate story set in a place many in the audience haven't even visited cinematically before.

It starts out in Johannesburg, where Atang Mokoenya (Zenzo Ngqobe) is spending his twenties getting into trouble. A trip out to the township for a rare visit with his father reveals that the man has died, and has already set money aside for a burial back in the village in Lesotho where Atang was born. He intends to return to the city after the funeral, but seeing childhood friend Dineo (Nozipho Nkelemba) gives him his first reason to stick around a little longer, while other things will also prevent a speedy return to the city.

It's actually almost comical at times how Atang finds reasons to get off a bus although Mudge has something a bit heavier in mind to get him to have a greater appreciation for his father and the land he called home. It's far from subtle - at the start of the movie, he's using a European name and eager to sell the mementos that have been handed down to him and even get some money by downgrading the casket - and at times, it's quite forced, as when Atang takes a job in a textile plant for no apparent reason. Sure, it has been mentioned that his father once had that sort of job, and Atang does need to be kept occupied while some other things happen elsewhere, but that's a reason for Mudge to put him there, not for Atang to go along that path.

Full review at EFC

Elle s'en va (On My Way)

* * * ½ (out of four)
Seen 3 March 2014 in the Regent Theartre (Gathr Preview Series, digital)

At one point in On My Way, Catherine Deneuve's Bettie looks at the kid singing some English-language song in the passenger seat, then at the freeway outside the window, and grumbles that she feels like she's in America. It's a funny bit that nevertheless makes me wonder if the road trip, and therefore the books and movies chronicling same, is a particularly American phenomenon, seldom seen in countries that connect their urban areas with quality passenger rail systems. A bit of a shame, if so, because On My Way is a fine example of the freedom that sort of story brings.

Bettie, being French - Miss Brittany for 1969, in fact - didn't really intend to go on a road trip, of course. Frazzled from running a restaurant that is starting to run worrisomely late on its bills, she is further stressed out when he mother Annie (Claude Gensac) makes sure Bettie know that her longtime lover has finally left his wife, but for a 25-year-old girl, and take a quick drive to clear her head. And keeps driving, because this is the sort of situation that makes one start smoking again, but it's hard to by cigarettes on Sunday except at a bar. Then... well, is the next day, and her daughter Muriel (Camille) calls, asking if she will come pick up her son Charly (Nemo Schiffman) and bring him to stay with his grandfather (Gérard Garouste) while she travels for a job interview. And then...

Well, a number of other things happen. Bettie does not particularly have adventures as she makes her way around her corner of France - what happens probably doesn't even rise to the level of misadventures - but she does have encounters. Some are very brief, such as the people at the food truck who let her charge her phone, and some go on for long enough to form some sort of a bond, if a temporary one. In many cases, things seem to go easier with lesser connections, but there is generally someone worth meeting at each stop and a nifty little scene as Bettie stop and speaks with them.

Full review at EFC

Sunday, February 09, 2014

Gathr Preview Series: The Pretty One

Was it a bit weird to come to the Regent on Monday for the screening? Well, not really; that's actually when it was held at the start. I will say, though, that it was weird to get into the auditorium and find people... Well, not actually in my seat, but in the ones directly in front of it. I suppose I could have just sat in the usual place, but just plopping down right next to a group of strangers in an auditorium that holds 500+ people would be kind of weird.

The screening was still in the main room, as it turned out. Indeed, the guy at the ticket booth wasn't sure what my prattling on like there was another was about. Next week's has a note about it being in the "Regent Underground", so the folks who make it (I'll be at the sci-fi festival) may be in for something new.

The Pretty One

* * ¾ (out of four)
Seen 3 February 2014 in the Regent Theatre (Gathr Previews Presents, digital)

It sometimes feels like Jenée LaMarque could have done more with The Pretty One; the idea of one identical twin taking the place of the other is certainly not new, but it's the sort of plot device that can play differently with each new iteration depending on the actor and character(s). Zoe Kazan certainly give this picture a solid place to start, and while she could have been given opportunities to do more, there's value in how she and the filmmakers never actually make a wrong step.

As the film starts, Laurel and Audrey (Kazan) have been living separately since high school: Confident Audrey sells storybook houses in the city, while mousy Laurel still lives with their widowed father. On their birthday, Audrey treats Laurel to a makeover, which is why there's some confusion at the hospital after the girls are involved in a head-on collision, leading to an initially-amnesiac Laurel taking her sister's place.

There is, of course, a job, a boyfriend (Ron Livingston), a best friend (Frankie Shaw), and a cute neighbor (Jake Johnson) to consider, but a grieving sister with a head injury explains away a lot, and while it can sometimes feel like hand-waving, it's often kind of a relief that LaMarque doesn't bog things down with much focus on the mechanics of Laurel avoiding discovery or their being some sort of exterior reason why she should. You can have those and still make a movie about a girl lacking in self-confidence to the point where she feels like she's more useful filling someone else's place and using that new perspective to figure out what her own role should be, but they do have the tendency to overwhelm. This movie takes the occasional short cut, but it seldom loses sight of its goal.

Full review at EFC

Sunday, February 02, 2014

Gathr Previews Series: Wajma (An Afghan Love Story)

My subscription to the Gathr Preview Series runs out in mid-March (not bad for a three-month membership purchased in September; cancellations and skip weeks must have caught up), and I must admit that at this point I'm not certain whether I will renew it or not. Then again, the decision may be taken out of my hands, as the Regent is scaling the program back starting tomorrow, and who knows if it will still be going on when it's time to renew?

For now, it will still be weekly, but the screenings are moving to Mondays, and rather than being in the 500-plus-seat theater, they'll be in a smaller screening room downstairs which I didn't know existed until the staff mentioned it before the show. That's potentially an issue for me, just because there are many other film programs in the area that take place on Monday: The Coolidge's Science on Screen and Big Screen Classics shows, for instance, or the DocYard presentations at the Brattle, or even Harvard Film Archive screenings. As I said back when this program started almost a year ago, it won't do well by making me choose between even some of their more promising features and Raiders of the Lost Ark in 35mm.

As to the new room... Well, we'll see. This last screening was an unfortunate example of the number of things that can go wrong between a venue that doesn't primarily show movies and a distributor that certainly has its own faults: The heat conked out mid-day, so it was just getting back to habitability when I arrived at 7pm, the movie occasionally froze a bit, and then in the last ten minutes just completely crapped out, dropping to the Blu-ray player's menu screen two or three times before the projectionist had to pull out a back-up machine and disc, which looked like it might have been a DVD. This isn't the first time this has happened, either.

I don't say that to imply that anybody involved is doing anything wrong - for the amount of movies the Regent shows, it probably doesn't make sense for them to invest in a full DCP system, and for the scale that Gathr seems to work on, I don't know if they could afford to supply something more reliable than a Blu-ray disc. And it's not as if they haven't tried to grow this program; I see it advertised, and I've heard the folks at the Regent express their frustration about not getting people to come out. I think it just might be untenable. The Regent is out of the way, but where else would you put this program? Sure, most weeks it could fit in the Somerville Theatre's micro-cinema, but that doesn't give you a lot of room for growth.

It's a shame. Tomorrow night's screening, The Pretty One with Zoe Kazan, looks like it should be a little more of a draw, but other movies featuring people the audience has heard of have just played to me and maybe a few others. We'll see how it goes.


As to this specific movie, I liked it, even though it is fairly rough in some spots. I do sort of wonder who the target audience is, like I do with many movies from the middle east: Was it made for a local Afghani audience, or the French financiers? Wajma was apparently submitted as Afghanistan's entry to the Oscars for Best Foreign Language Film, so I doubt it's anywhere near as far from local favor as the "Iranian" films that often seem to be targeting western art houses more than local cinemas, but the moments when it seems especially down on the options available for women locally make me wonder just how well it has been received in its home country.


Wajma: An Afghan Love Story

* * * (out of four)
Seen 28 January 2014 in the Regent Theatre (Gathr Previews Presents, digital)

Depending on where in the world it plays, Wajma be titled "An Afghan Love Story" or use that as a subtitle. It's a somewhat ironic one, as those hoping for a romance that brings either cheer or enjoyable sadness will walk away with their desires unfulfilled. Instead, it delivers an unsentimental look at where being head-over-heels can lead in some parts of the world, and does so with impressive clarity.

Wajma (Wahma Bahar) is twenty years old and lives in Kabul with her mother (Brehna Bahar), grandmother, and brother; her father (Haji Gul Aser) works in another part of the country, clearing minefields. She's applied to law school but also has a crush on her brother Haseeb's friend Mustafa (Mustafa Abdulsatar). It's reciprocated, and it seems like just a matter of time before their families officially arrange a match, so they discretely go out and spend some time together unchaperoned. One thing leads to another, and highly conservative Afghanistan is not the best place to be when those things don't happen in the proper order.

What follows is not the entire list of horrors that one reads about women being put through in middle-eastern countries; in fact, upon reflection, it's actually relatively mild, in that one is more likely to be taken aback by the intent behind a blow rather than the physical damage it does. The fascinating thing about it is that, while foreign viewers will likely come away wondering if every man in Afghanistan needs a punch in the nose, Wajma seems like it could actually play to the local audiences that identifies with the likes of Mustafa or Wajma's father without much, if any, alteration: There's one line in which a prosecutor refers to "this backwards country", but it could very well have an unexpected nuance in Persian. Even the most sympathetic male character argues matters of fact instead of morality. I doubt filmmaker Barmak Akram's actual intention was to make a movie about a good man who deals with his slatternly daughter as mercifully as he responsibly can, but that perspective is surprisingly visible and not explicitly rebuked.

Full review at EFC.

Monday, January 20, 2014

Gathr Previews Presents: Kids for Cash

Before the movie, the folks at the Regent asked if I had any pull with the Gathr people, so that they could get something a little more upbeat in the series - Summer in February was admittedly a downer and this sort of movie can be a hard sell as well. I kind of wish I'd realized that Black Out was the next one in the series; what I remember of it from Fantasia is that it's actually a fun, fast-paced caper, and I'm looking forward to giving it a second shot, as I was wiped the first time.

One thing that I was a bit curious about once this movie had a little more time to sit for me was the demographics of Luzerne County - I think all of the kids shown as victims in this movie were Caucasian, and I wonder if this is generally representative, a reflection of who was willing to talk to the filmmakers, or unintentional bias from trying to show that the teenagers sentenced were good kids who didn't deserve this. It doesn't really matter for this movie individually, but if you expand its themes to the problems with America's for-profit incarceration industry and the juvenile justice system in general, that's an issue that will come up and deserves examination.

And I think those are broader themes that do deserve an audience's attention - as bad as what Mark Ciavarella and Michael T. Conahan did was, the bounty system that the phrase "kids for cash" conjures up isn't the root problem the way that jail as an answer to every societal ill (and a for-profit industry to facilitate it) is. Kids for Cash tells its story well enough, but eventually drifts too far from the bigger picture.

Kids for Cash

* * ½ (out of four)
Seen 14 January 2014 in the Regent Theatre (Gathr Previews, digital)

"Kids For Cash!" makes a great tabloid headline - heck, it looks good on a broadsheet when something akin to the scandal that this movie documents is discovered. It may not be the best title for this particular film, though - aside from only sharing the same subject as William Ecenbarger's similarly-titled book, it winds up limiting compared to the various issues that director Robert May brings up over the course of a somewhat scattered film.

That is the phrase that entered the public consciousness a few years ago, though, when Luzerne County, Pennsylvania judges Mark Ciavarella and Michael T. Conahan were accused of sending juvenile offenders to a correctional facility they had a financial interest in for minor offenses. The stories we hear from roughly a half-dozen of the hundreds of victims are terrible. There are, however, elements that may not exactly argue that there's another side to the story, but that the characterization of it as a simple transaction is not entirely accurate.

Perhaps the most surprising thing about this movie is the way that May covers all of the angles, including ones that are seldom seen in the same film. Yes, he talks to a number of the kids who were imprisoned, as well as their parents, those involved in their defense, and the reporters who worked on the story for the Wilkes-Barre Times Leader. There are man-in-the-street (well, man-in-a-diner) interviews and visits to a local talk-radio show. But, fascinatingly, there is also plenty of face time with Ciavarella and Conahan; even though we see footage of one of the parents screaming at Ciavarella outside the courtroom about how her son is dead because of him, both parties participate in the film. It's almost disconcerting, given how "___ declined to be interviewed" is such a staple of the documentary where the focus might be even the slightest bit contentious.

Full review at EFC.

Thursday, January 16, 2014

This Week In Tickets: 6 January 2014 - 12 January 2014

Indication that it's a new year: The desk calendar fits differently on the scanner.

This Week in Tickets

First full week in work and otherwise on a regular schedule in over a month, which was in some ways tough getting used to an in some ways reassuring; it was sort of easy to lose track of the days of the week. And the weather didn't make it any easier - the first couple of days were cold, much nastier than the days at the end of the previous week when all the sca-a-a-ry snow was coming down. It made the title of Tuesday's Gathr screening, Summer in February, a bit of a tease, and made any moment spent outside waiting for the bus to or from Arlington, not much fun at all. The movie itself, at least, wasn't bad, a decent costume drama that interested me more for the details.

It was such a reasonably busy week at work that I didn't get out to anything else and was considering just packing it in early on Friday, but all the caffeine finally kicked in by the time I got to the Coolidge at midnight for Wrong Cops, a fun sort-of-spinoff of Wrong that was interesting with the midnight crowd. Even the production company vanity card at the start made us laugh for how off-kilter it was.

I wound up seeing relatively little on Saturday - a midnight movie meant a 2:30am bedtime which meant no time to go see the cheap(ish) screening of The Legend of Hercules on Saturday, and then I found myself staying in until it was time to head over to Fresh Pond for Cold Comes the Night. Not a great movie - I was seeing it half out of fondness for the director's previous film, half to support unusual genre movies playing locally - but not bad. It was actually pouring rain when I got out, though, getting me soaking wet and glad I had time to dry out before heading to the Brattle for Here Comes the Devil, a borderline-great horror movie that suggests that the director of Cold Sweat may have a little more than I expected in him.

Sunday, I met up with friends at The Past, which really needs no "borderline" to qualify its greatness. After that, it was a trip to the grocery store, dinner, and some time to actually write.


Summer in February
Wrong Copes
Cold Comes the Night
Here Comes the Devil
The Past

Friday, January 10, 2014

Gathr Previews Presents: Summer in February

Tuesday night was among the coldest we've had in this area in a while, so let me tell you, being let into the theater a full half hour before the movie started was much appreciated.

It was an interesting movie, although as it went on, I was kind of making associations that didn't necessarily have a lot to do with the movie itself, but do sort of help show how well it does at evoking the time period. First is the one I mention in the review, the Bertie Wooster "well, when someone asks you to marry them" bit. There's a moment when a marriage proposal is made and accepted in what seems like a hasty manner, and it made me wonder just how casually or formally such things happened a hundred years ago, what with dating as we know it not nearly so common as it is now.

The other thing, though, was from the scenes where the entire community was getting together and singing or the like. But it put me in mind of how, when people talk about the way content companies freak out over digital distribution, it's a reflection of how they've tried to kill every new distribution since there has been commercial distribution of media and how even gramophone recordings were fought because they might cut into the lucrative sheet music business. It sounds goofy, but you can see, with everyone gathering around the piano, where this could really have been a thing.

Anyway, it looks like this one was a true preview, and the movie opens next weekend. It's not bad, though I don't know how much distribution it will get with the award nominees taking so much of the boutique theater space.

Summer in February

* * ¾ (out of four)
Seen 7 January 2014 at the Regent Theatre (Gathr Previews Presents, digital)

Summer in February takes place in 1913 Cornwall, which had become an artists' colony, and in some ways that community is more interesting than any of the people in it. There's nothing wrong with the story the filmmakers are trying to tell or the characters involved, but there are interesting details to the scenes of people being a community that make the love triangle at the center of the movie seem kind of generic by comparison.

That main story has Florence Carter Wood (Emily Browning) coming to Cornwall to live with her brother Joey (Max Deacon) and study painting, though she's pretty enough that some of the artists would have her model as well. One who does is AJ Munnings (Dominic Cooper), a brilliant painter who is as confident of his abilities as he is loud in pubs. His opposite in terms of temperament is Captain Gilbert Evans (Dan Stevens), a handsome reservist who connects these artists with spaces to rent. AJ and Gilbert are friends, but someone like Florence can shake up that status quo.

Fortunately, Florence is not just there to be a thing that brings two men into conflict, but a person who, when she's at her best, can push back at AJ and likely has the potential to become a fine artist herself. She'd likely be diagnosed with something and medicated to help regulate it today, and Emily Browning does well in portraying that sort of fragility as well as the way that Florence is, as they would say then, a sheltered young woman who does not know much of the world. Browning may not quite make Florence the center of the movie, but she does let the viewer see why she can attract through her strength despite a big dollop of insecurity.

Full review at EFC.

Wednesday, January 08, 2014

Gathr Previews Presents: Jump

If I were really clever and writing fast enough to get the review of A Touch of Sin up while there was a little more left of it's brief run at the Brattle, it might have been a good idea to compare and contrast the two. Both movies, after all, are stories of four characters whose lives intersect with occasionally nasty outcomes. It probably wouldn't have turned out well for the decent but not exactly brilliant Jump, though, as Jia Zhang-ke's film is better in just about every fashion.

And it would have been unfair; Jump is less the single-person anthology than a single story told from multiple perspectives. In fact, I think you could probably boil Jump down to the point where it's more obviously Greta's story with the other well-developed characters moving in and out and have it work out a little better. The structure here is kind of a mess, and I think putting effect before cause and having the audience see too many perspectives hurts the movie.

But I also have to be a little honest and say that the end was a problem for me, too. As usual, that goes after the review.

Jump

* * ¾ (out of four)
Seen 30 December 2013 at the Regent Theatre (Gathr Previews Presents, digital)

Jump spends a fair amount of time presenting itself a certain type of movie - sarcastic, amoral, built on a fractured timeline that aims to make the audience feel clever for putting its multiple points of view together. It does that reasonably well, in fact, but it may not actually be best served by playing it cool in that way, as it's at its best and most interesting when it stops fooling around and says what the characters are feeling.

It's New Year's Eve in Derry, Northern Ireland, and Greta (Nichola Burley) is getting ready to jump off a bridge, worried that she's too much her cruel father's daughter. Greta's best friend Marie (Charlene McKenna) is worried about the way she's been acting lately, but she and her other friend Dara (Valerie Kane) have their own misadventures on tap. Fortunately, Greta is interrupted by Pearse Kelly (Martin McCann), who has been looking for his missing brother and been beaten up for the trouble. It seems Sean Kelly ran afoul of local gangster Frank Feeney (Lalor Roddy), whose vault has just been robbed. He dispatches weary enforcer Ross (Ciaran McMenamin) to get the money back, along with a couple of henchman (Richard Dormer & Packy Lee) who may be more hindrance than help.

Are all these stories eventually going to intersect by the time the movie is over? Most certainly, although writer/director Kieron J. Walsh doesn't always make the most of it - at least if you define making the most of it as having disparate pieces suddenly snap together in a way that the audience doesn't see coming but which makes perfect sense. Walsh and co-writer Steve Brookes do build a little community where everything is connected, at least, with only one or two coincidences more than would be ideal, but it often seems like they want the connection but instead have occasionally split a scene in half in such a way that it's incomplete the first time the audience sees it and redundant the second.


Full review at EFC.

SPOILERS!

After turning the movie over a few times while considering and writing the review, I sort of wonder if I'm not looking at it wrong. I walked out disappointed because there are certain obvious ways to expect a movie like this to shake out - it's got a pair of good-looking leads falling in love at first sight and it's set on New Year's Eve, which is a natural signifier of new starts and happy endings in most cases. So when Walsh kills Pearse and it turns out there's no backdoor out of it... Well, what's up with that?

I still don't think it quite makes a satisfying story. The easily-discovered robbery Greta and Pearse execute and his being run over by Dara basically wind up putting Greta and Marie back where they were before the start of the movie; planning to move to Australia and able to do so in part because of the thing Greta feared from the start - they were able to just walk away from the crimes they were complicit in. And maybe that's what Walsh was going for: You can literally dress Greta up like an angel, but it won't make her one, and New Year's Eve isn't a hard line but just another point in an endless cycle. Still, she wants to be a good person and at least has a friend who is one, so maybe a new start in a new place will let it happen.

!SRELIOPS

Monday, December 30, 2013

This These Weeks In Tickets: 9 December 2013 - 22 December 2013

Two weeks this time, because I didn't have a lot of time for writing while on vacation. Nor necessarily a lot of time for seeing movies, for that matter, but I saw a lot of other stuff.

9 December 2013 - 15 December 2013
16 December 2013 - 22 December 2013

This Week in Tickets

The first couple days of the week were spoken for before the week started, especially Monday. I gobbled up a ticket for Who Framed Roger Rabbit in 35mm a few weeks in advance, and while that Science on Screen presentation didn't completely sell out like I expected, it was a packed crowd.



That's Melissa Franklin, Physics Chair at Harvard University, delivering a talk before the movie about cartoon physics and her own work detecting the Higgs Boson. It was a discussion designed to give a person whiplash, moving in fairly rapid fashion from the "Cartoon Laws of Physics" that got emailed around back when people still emailed things around (I'm guessing it would be a listicle/slide-show now) and some fairly advanced particle physics, but only one kid in the audience seemed to actually get impatient.

Not pictured - because he stood up and sat down from his seat a couple rows behind me too quickly - is writer Gary K. Wolf, who wrote the original novel Who Censored Roger Rabbit? that the film was adapted from. I think the guy is following me; though he lives in Brookline now, he was in Worcester when I was going to college there; supposedly the Acapulco had a drink called the "Toon Tonic", as seen in his less well-known (but actually very funny) follow-up, Who P-p-p-plugged Roger Rabbit?. Even back then, there was talk of a third book that he was sitting on until it could be released alongside a movie sequel; since that new movie looks unlikely to happen, as Bob Hoskins is unlikely to be up to it, he's finally decided to release it electronically; I'm looking forward to reading Who Wacked Roger Rabbit? soon.

Tuesday night's movie was also staked out ahead of time, as the latest in the Gathr preview series. Pretty Old isn't a bad movie, but it's a somewhat odd thing. As soon as somebody casually mentions what the participants in the Miss Senior Sweetheart beauty pageant pay for an all-inclusive package, it starts to sound more like a fantasy camp than a "legitimate" contest, but the movie plows on like it's the latter. It makes me wonder how much the movie is a documentary and how much it's an advertisement, making it hard to figure out what i think of its merits.

Much of the rest of the week was spent packing or otherwise getting ready, just squeezing in a quick screening of The Last Days on Mars on the afternoon I left for vacation. It was between that and The Hobbit, and while I didn't wind up seeing the better movie that day, it fit my schedule better and I wouldn't have had any other chances to see it on the big screen.

Then, that evening, after everything was all packed, I hauled my bags to Logan and flew to Paris's Orly airport by way of Heathrow, where I actually stepped through customs and back in order to pick up a Tep wireless internet device. Next time I visit Europe, I'll probably just pay for the shipping rather than do that; I left enough time between flights, but what if I hadn't or someone decided this activity was suspicious. At any rate, I made it, although my plan to sleep on the plan and arrive in Europe tired by with my clock adjusted didn't work out - there was a baby on the plane, and he or she did what babies do in an unfamiliar situation surrounded by strange people, and cried. So, when I got to the hotel at about 4pm local time, I dropped to the bed, took the sort of nap that leaves one awake but not particularly energetic when I re-awoke a few hours later, and then eventually dropped for long enough that I wouldn't have time to collect the Paris Pass/Paris Museum Pass during Sunday's crazy-short hours.

So, I figured, why not start at the Eiffel Tower.

... It's one of the things not covered by the passes, it didn't have short hours, so I could test my navigation skills inside and outside the Metro without stress, and, hey, no point in saving it for later. It actually took me two tickets to get up to the top - one for the stairs up to the second floor" (which is 622 steps up), and another for the elevator to the top. Quite well worth it for the view and further appreciating just how massive it is when viewed from the ground. Photos from there begin here on my Facebook page.

After that, I headed to my first movie shown in Paris, a subtitled screening of Bong Joon-ho's Snowpiercer. It was a bit of an adventure getting there - the various trains were tricky, the mall had three separate movie theaters (they love movies in Paris), and my debit card was strangely reluctant to be used any place but restaurants, but I got to see the new Bong movie on the big screen in the country of its source material's origin without it being cut, and that was pretty darn cool.

This Week in Tickets

Stubless: The Arc de Triomphe (Monday the 16th), The Louvre (Wednesday the 18th), The Musee Rodin (Thursday the 19th), The Musee des Armes (Thursday the 19th), Notre Dame Cathedral (Friday the 20th), The Crypt at Notre Dame (Friday the 20th).

The Paris Museum Pass is a pretty good value; in fact, if planning a trip to Paris, I'd recommend getting one of those and not bothering with the Paris Pass - I didn't use the Red Bus, and I think the only thing I used the non-Museum Pass for was the Bateaux Parisiens. Most of the time, just showing the red museum pass (which folds out to become a brochure) got me waved into what I wanted to see without the need to log the date and receive a ticket.

Plus, maybe one of those could have been picked up/purchased without the hassle I went through that morning. Just giving my name and showing my voucher on my phone/tablet wasn't enough, they needed the printed voucher. So, back to the hotel, get that, return, pick up pass... And find out very little is open on Monday. Thus, the first stop is La Cinematheque Francaise.

It had a lot of "no photography" signs around, so the only picture I took was this one, of the spiffy-looking outside. Interestingly, most of the exhibits open to the public were from the early days of cinema, when people were still figuring out hardware standards; I don't know if it really got beyond the silent era before the exhibit on Jean Cocteau. There was also a pay exhibit on Pier Paolo Pasolini's Roma that I didn't take in which was keyed to a retrospective in their theater.

After a pretty darn good steak at Hippopotamus (a steakhouse near the Cinematheque that I later discovered was a chain; always kind of strange), I headed to the Champs-Elysees to take a look at the Arc de Triomphe (pictures start here). It's another spiffy monument with lots and lots of stairs which looks amazing lit up at night. So did the Champs-Elysees itself, although the camera on my phone didn't capture it very well.

Tuesday, I started out at La Musee des Arts et Metiers (pictures start here), literally "the museum of arts and crafts", although here it focuses on technology and inventions. It is full of nifty stuff, and while at a certain point I got a little fatigued, you get a second wind in a hurry once you get to l'Eglise, a former cathedral that has bunches of early planes and automobiles packed into it, along with Foucault's Pendulum. It's a seriously impressive room. There was also a little display with robots from various movies and a no-pictures-allowed exhibition - "Mecanhumanimal" - by comic book artist Enki Bilal. Never one of my particular favorites from Humanoids, but some of his newer stuff that was on display had me fairly interested.

After that, I did one of the boat tours of the Seine (pictures start here). I always like seeing a city from its river.

Wednesday was pretty much given over to the Louvre entirely. As with the British Museum last year, I made sure to choose the day when it would be open late, since I knew it was going to take a lot of time. That it did; this picture got taken before noon and my phone's battery crapped out before I was done at around eight-thirty. It's a place thoroughly worth an entire day's visit, with it always worth remembering to look up because something awesome may be on the ceiling. I was, admittedly, exhausted by the end, to the point where when my path took me through the German and Dutch paintings, I was kind of thinking "oh, huh, another nicely-painted portrait" and then when I got to the French sculptures, that was just warehousing. Still, an astonishing number of beautiful things.

Thursday I started off at the Musee Rodin (pictures!) on the advice of my sister-in-law Jen. It's a nifty little museum, with the bulk of the exhibits like The Thinker and The Gates of Hell actually outside in a garden. There was also a nice exhibit on Camille Claudel, a student and lover of Rodin's.

I didn't get pictures of a couple things I saw afterward - there was some sort of strike or protest going on right outside the museum when I was leaving, and then a couple blocks away there was the most nondescript gas station I've ever seen - a couple of pumps by the side of the road, and I couldn't see what they were connected to until the second or third time I walked past it and saw a tiny cubbyhole of a shop behind it.

The stop after that was nearby, l'Hotel des Invalides (pics). It is home to, among other things, the Musee d'Armes and the Tomb of Napoleon. The former was pretty cool, although I joked that the medieval section seemed to be warehousing suits of armor in case modern weaponry just stopped working. There was also a World War II section, an interesting contrast to similar exhibits in American museums because it pretty much only covers the war in Europe. As soon as the Nazis fall, it's "and then some other stuff happened in the Pacific".

Then came the Tomb of Napoleon, which is just as over-the-top and grandiose as one would hope. It really should be a set for a movie based around some sort of treasure hunt. This was followed by stopping in a burger place I came across, because there's something kind of fun about seeing how other places imitate the American diner experience.

Funny story about Friday: Ever since arriving in Paris, I've seen signs warning about pickpockets, and I kind of thought it was cute: Most places I've traveled, you get warned about being mugged, and pickpocketing is at least non-violent. Then I got to the spot where I took this picture, and couldn't find my wallet. Fortunately, it was back at the hotel, but, yeesh, that was a half-hour or so of panic I didn't need. Bummer, because I quickly grew to love Ile Saint-Louis and Ile de la Cite, where I saw Notre Dame. Astonishingly pretty church, although by the time I was halfway up the towers, I was really starting to wonder what the heck was up with this city and stairs. I must say, though, that the inside of the cathedral was kind of weird for me - aside from the constant bass hum, there are all these tourist things with price tags on them all around, and I wonder if they're covered up or moved out during services.

The Crypt isn't quite underneath Notre Dame, but the plaza next to it. It's pretty neat; not quite as impressive as the archaeological museum at Pointe-A-Calliere in Montreal, but the ruins (pictures!) are much older. Still cool, and left me enough time to look at the booksellers near Pont Neuf and even pop into a Bandes-Dessinees shop for some graphic novels I'll need to read with a dictionary open.

Saturday started with a trip to the Catacombs (pics), which is pretty darn impressive, and also creepy. I spent the rest of the day wandering through the city, stopping at various patisseries and boulangeries to try various baked goods. Highly recommended, that. I bounced around the city a bit looking at the Place de la Concorde and the Champs-Elysees, finishing up with a couple of movies at theaters across the street from each other, The Immigrant & Zulu.

After that? Getting back to the hotel, sleeping fast, and then making my way to Orly and back to Boston. Long day of flying, and when I got back to the house, I basically had time to turn the heat back on before dropping. Can't recommend the whole experience enough, though.

Who Framed Roger Rabbit?

* * * * (out of four)
Seen 9 December 2013 at Coolidge Corner Theatre #1 (Sciene on Screen, 35mm)

When Who Framed Roger Rabbit? came out twenty-five years ago, a good amount of the hype came from how seamlessly the animated characters blended with the live actors and real-world environments. A generation later, it's not so amazing, and the seams show a little bit more - but that's okay; the border between the human world and the Toon world can be a bit ragged. It's not deliberate - director Robert Zemeckis has always been about pushing what film can do technically forward as opposed to exploiting its limitations - but it's a testament to how delightful a film he made that we're willing to try and ascribe greatness even to its imperfections.

Not that there are many of them. Zemeckis and his collaborators do something uncommon at the time - expending a lot of resources on a fairly goofy idea - and they almost unerringly hit the sweet spot where things can both be absurd but fit together just well enough to work as a detective story. Not a fair-play mystery, but a Dashiell Hammett-style pulp, albeit one whose rough edges have been sanded down to where audiences can get a thrill from grown-up material bumping up against cartoons rather than overwhelming them.

The reason I'm sad there was never a film sequel (and why I was grateful for original novelist Gary K. Wolf using the movie continuity for the later books) is that these are some genuinely fun characters. Bob Hoskins dives right into every gumshoe trope as Eddie Valiant but still makes him a guy we like and want to cheer up on his own, while Christopher Lloyd is note-perfect as Judge Doom. The main toons are pretty great, too - Roger Rabbit is a cheery, optimistic nut who wears his heart on his sleeve and could be quite annoying if played even a little bit the wrong way, but that doesn't happen. What was surprising on my first viewing in a while is just how great a character Jessica is; her face and Kathleen Turner's voice are more expressive than you likely remember, and as the movie goes on and we learn just how much truth there is in her claim that she's not bad, just drawn that way, she becomes a lot more than just a literally cartoonish bit of sex appeal.

I kind of fear what would happen if Disney were to do a sequel today; the sort of self-referentiality and packing in of details that made it a treat in 1988 is more common today, and the effects work would similarly be expected rather than a bit of a wonder. The original is still pretty amazing, though, maybe the peak of how Robert Zemeckis was once better than anyone at telling an entertaining story while rising to incredible technical challenges, and I'd love to see him do something like that again.

Pretty Old

* * ¼ (out of four)
Seen 10 December 2013 in the Regent Theatre (Gathr Previews, digital)

There's a moment somewhere in the middle of Pretty Old when Lenny "Low Price" Kaplan, the guy behind the Miss Senior Sweetheart beauty pageant, mentions that the contestants pay $625 for their week taking part in the event, and it's more disappointing to hear than it has any right to be. It's a bit of information that highlights just how much of a fantasy camp the whole thing is, even though it's presented as a contest.

There's nothing wrong with that, of course, it's just an odd thing for them to downplay to the extent they do, in part because it means the rest of the movie has a bit of a hard time finding focus - it's not about the women in the 2009 edition being competitive or really going all-out to win, but it doesn't really build on the friendships that perhaps form between the women who do this every year. It's not quite an advertisement, and it's not close to being a pointed commentary on how these women who have lived full lives are worried about being called pretty. And while there's something to be said about just doing a survey of this odd little phenomenon, a documentary like this often winds up feeling like the director just wasn't able to find his story, or a point he wanted to make, either on the ground or in the editing room.

He does manage to meet a fairly nice group of ladies - the core four that director Walter Matteson follows range in age from 65 to 81, with hometowns scattered from Michigan to the Virgin Islands. They're pleasant folks, facing the mental and physical challenges that the elderly face, and even the ones who maybe have way too much invested in how they look are fairly easy to like. Interestingly, there aren't many in the contest that you'd say look ten or twenty years younger than they actually are; these are old ladies revisiting their youth, as opposed to women who still haven't let go of it.

As these things go, it's fairly entertaining - Matteson doesn't linger over dull parts, and gives everybody involved their due. He presents this eccentric little event without either overpraising it or looking down upon it, and finds a couple of moments - like when he cuts between the faces of the also-rans to show that second place never really starts to taste good - that are darn clever. It amuses, and I'm sure that the Fall River civic club that operates it as a fundraiser will happily put a link to it on their website to show what the pageant is about. It's just not the sort of documentary that tells a great story or illustrates a point surprisingly well.

Who Framed Roger Rabbit?Pretty OldThe Last Days on MarsEiffel TowerSnowpiercer
La Cinematheque FrancaisMusee des Arts et MetiersBateaux ParisiensCatacombs de ParisThe ImmigrantZulu

Wednesday, December 11, 2013

Gathr Previews: Night Train to Lisbon

Since the Regent isn't primarily a film venue - and even if it was, these screenings don't necessarily pack the house - December looks like it's wound up being full of conflicts. During the first week of the month, an event later in the week needed time to rehearse on the stage, but this week's offering from Gathr looked one with mainstream appeal. The best way to fit both in appeared to be running the movie at 9pm rather than the usual 7:30.

Pain in the neck for me, as I tend to hop off the 350 bus on the way home from work, but there was nothing to keep me at the office until 8pm. Plus, I kind of didn't carve out a time for supper, and attendance at these events is so low that they don't even bother opening the concession stand.

The movie itself ended up not really being bad, but not being what I'd hoped from the cast and description. Literally not what I'd hoped, in that I'd gotten the idea it was a thriller but that was a fairly small part of it. Apparently, it's made its way into some theaters this past weekend, and I'm mildly curious as to what the sales job has been there.

Night Train to Lisbon

* * ½ (out of four)
Seen 3 December 2013 at the Regent Theatre (Gathr Previews Presents, digital)

Sometimes, there are things that the written word can do that a film can't. In Night Train to Lisbon, Raimund Gregorius (Jeremy Irons) tells how certain sentences in the book at the film's center had a profound effect on him, but even with Irons's fine voice... Well, they're nice sentences, but they don't have the direct connection to our brain that they do for him. And then, as Raimund's search for the source of those words plays out, there's a sense that it, too, may have been more absorbing in print.

The book in question comes into Gregorius's possession when the professor at a Bern preparatory school prevents a young woman from jumping off a bridge. She soon disappears, but leaves her coat behind, in which he finds a small book and a train ticket to Lisbon. He impulsively takes the train, reading the book along the way, and by the time he reaches Portugal, is just as fascinated by Amadeu Almeida de Prado (Jack Huston), the man who wrote it during the revolution forty years ago, as he is by the young woman he started out following.

There are three things going on here with the potential to be interesting stories - the tale of how a privileged young man like Amadeu becomes involved with the revolution and a spy by the name of Estefânia (Mélanie Laurent) with a photographic memory who is involved with Jorge O'Kelly (August Diehl), his best friend from school; the mystery of who the girl whose life he saved is and why this book affected her even more than it did him; and how Gregorius searching for these answers may help him break out of his tweedy shell, especially with the aid of Mariana (Martina Gedeck), the optician who helps him in this quest in part because her uncle João (Tom Courtenay) was involved in the revolution. The trouble is that somewhere along the line, be it in Bille August's direction, the screenplay by Greg Latter & Ulrich Herrmann, or Pascal Mercier's original novel, the emphasis seems to shift between Bern and Lisbon. A great mystery is initially posed, with a nameless girl, a trail of clues to be followed, and the train of the title, which certainly sounds more exciting than a quick flight, because trains are romantic.

Full review at EFC.

Thursday, November 28, 2013

Gathr Preview Series: Cold Turkey

I'm writing this on my way home from my own trip home for Thanksgiving, a pretty quick circuit to Portland, Maine to see my Dad, his wife, and her kids & grandkids, my brothers all being at their respective wives' families' gatherings. That's cool - it's pretty stress-free and the family being away for Thanksgiving generally means they're around for Christmas, allowing me to watch the Awesome Nieces unwrap presents in person.

And there's still a lot of pie.

Not a particularly important fact, that, and you can hardly call it ironic or coincidental; Gathr scheduled their Thanksgiving movie for a couple days before Thanksgiving, and I had a bit of a backlog to get through before I got to this. But then, it's only proper to publish the review for something called Cold Turkey after Thanksgiving dinner, right?

Interestingly, this was one of the better-attended previews that wasn't attached to a live appearance or other sponsor, which seems kind of random. It might be difficult to generate momentum from that, as next week's is pushed fairly late (9pm). I'll be there because it looks like a pretty interesting movie, but it won't fit the "take 350 bus home from work, get off in Arlington Center, get food at Elton's/Retro Burger, see movie" schedule.

Cold Turkey

* ¾ (out of four)
Seen 24 November 2013 at the Regent Theatre (Gathr Preview Series, digital)

Folks from other continents much watch movies taking place on Thanksgiving and wonder why Americans have given themselves and extra week end of annoying travel to share a relatively bland meal and unresolved issues with family - even if many do end with the family members realizing how much they need each other. It's actually a lot more pleasant than that most of the time, but you certainly wouldn't know that from watching the likes of Cold Turkey.

This movie's family is the Turners. "Poppy" Jim (Peter Bogdanovich) and his second wife Deborah (Cheryl Hines) are hosting, as usual, their son Jacob (Ashton Holmes), his daughter Lindsay (Sonya Walger) from his first marriage, spouses Missy (Amy Ferguson) & TJ (Ross Partridge), and Lindsay's kids. This year, estranged daughter Nina (Alicia Witt) is making the trip for the first time in fifteen years, though she and her boyfriend Hank (Wilson Bethel) have an ulterior motive - but then, so do Lindsay and Jacob.

Some movies about family conflicts like to show them as simmering just under the surface before they explode, but to watch the Turners is not just to find their being related as unlikely (facial resemblance doesn't seem to have been a huge factor in casting) but to wonder if any members of this clan actually like each other. They're a distant, miserable bunch, and there's no indication of how the shambling alcoholic that Jim is could ever have ever inspired the sort of affection that has his kids calling him "Poppy" into adulthood. It livens up a bit when Nina arrives, but adding unbalanced and inappropriate to the mix just makes things less boring; it doesn't give the audience much reason to actually invest in the characters.

Full review at EFC.

Thursday, November 21, 2013

This Week In Tickets: 1 November 2013 - 17 November 2013

It's a good week for a movie blogger when there's reason to write about what interests you and be reasonably curtabout what doesn't.

This Week in Tickets

This week, for instance, there wasn't a whole to say about the first thing I saw, Monday's About Time, that necessarily fit in a full "should-you-see-it-or-not" review. It's enjoyable enough, if a bit overdone in the way Romantic Richard Curtis movies tend to be. You're not going to go far wrong seeing it, but some things stick at me a little more than they maybe should.

Tuesday was Gathr Presents Filmmaker Magazine's "25 New Faces of Independent Film", from which I was perhaps expecting more than I should have. I was under the impression that the three shorts would be followed with Q&A or discussion - the description didn't explicitly say so, but did have phrasing along the lines of them "hitting the road" with the magazine's editor, and I figured that the lack of an entry the next week meant they were spacing things out to accomadate this, but if they did, they didn't stop in Arlington, MA. Not a bad set of shorts, really - "Needle", "Refuge", and "Surveyor" all had something to recommend- but it was a quick night for me and maybe one other person.

This weekend was the first time I really found myself thinking about the new MoviePass restrictions, as I made sure to get to the earliest screening on Friday night among the movies I wanted to see, so that the 24-hour window wouldn't cause an issue. That turned out to be The Counselor, and while it turned out I wasn't able to catch anything at 7-ish on Saturday, I wound up deciding to use cash rather than MoviePass to see the Coolidge's midnight screening of The Wicker Man in its Final Cut so that I could use it on a more expensive screening of The Best Man Holiday. I will, honestly, write that long-delayed piece about MoviePass this weekend, because I think that this need to use it strategically is something worth talking about, as it's the sort of need for planning that they worked to move away from last year.

Also due for a write-up: The Showcase SuperLux, where I took in a second screening of Thor: The Dark World afterward. I want to give it one more look from the pricey seats, but something about it is not sitting quite right, even if it is delivering all it promises.

About Time

* * * (out of four)
Seen 11 November 2013 at AMC Boston Common #12 (first-run, DCP)

For the longest time, I would see Richard Curtis's name on a movie as screenwriter (and, later, director) and be kind of disappointed that it was almost inevitably a thoroughly earnest contemporary romance. What had happened to the guy who did sharp, occasionally mean-spirited comedy that rewarded a little bit of extra background with Rowan Atkinson on the likes of Blackadder? Departed for more lucrative pastures. Now, I guess, I'm to the point of not really minding. I like the charming love stories well enough and Curtis does them well.

That's the case with About Time: He's got a clever little spin to put on it - Tim (Domhnall Gleeson) is told by his father (Bill Nighy) that the men in their family can return to other points in their lives,and he opts to use it in large part to make sure things go smoothly with Mary (Rachel McAdams), a nigh-perfect girl he meets and then un-meets while trying to help someone else. Curtis has cast himself a pretty darn adorable couple in Gleeson & McAdams, surrounded them by an enjoyable supporting cast, and let them do their thing. He delivers a Richard Curtis movie and the folks who come for tha will leave pleased.

It is, thankfully, a bit more than that; as the movie goes on, the relationship between Tim and his father takes on a greater focus, especially toward the end, when it indulges in a familiar time-travel fantasy rather wonderfully. He's also clever in how he uses limits imposed upon this ability by the characters to demonstrate the idea that at certain points in one's life, there is no going back to the way things were before - although I must admit that the biggest demonstration ties things up in a knot that Doc Brown couldn't make sense of no matter how large a blackboard you gave him.

I also have to admit to being a bit concerned about some of the movie's sexual politics - specifically, the way that only the men in this family can travel in time. On the one hand, it focuses the plot on Tim and his Dad, and that's nice and tight. On the other... Well, at what point do Tim's attempts to reconnect with Mary after a good deed undoes them meeting and her giving him her number approximate stalking? The implication seems to be that this is okay because they hit it off the first time, but Curtis seems to very carefully avoid situations where Tim could be considered a creep as opposed to someone who recognizes True Love, even though it would take just the smallest of changes to tip the scale. Also, the difficulties Tim's sister Kit Kat (Lydia Wilson) has both in her love life and in moving to the city in general are in contrast to how Tim can make everything go well. I wondered if it was a sly commentary on how men get more second chances than women, or an example of how selfish Tim can be (SPOILER! he actually undoes setting his sister's life right because it has a butterfly-effect change on his daughter; apparently the altered child doesn't have the same right not to be rewritten because Tim had just met him !SRELIOPS), but Curtis really doesn't dwell on this enough to give the impression that he was thinking about it this way.

That doesn't undo the enjoyable parts of the movie, but it stuck with me. Time travel isn't for dabblers.

"Needle"

* * * (out of four)
Seen 12 November 2013 at the Regent Theatre (Gathr Previews Presents New Faces of Independent Film, digital)

All three short films in this program were roughly 20-25 minutes, and while that doesn't necessarily seem like a long time, it can be. "Needle" was one of two shorts in the program whose craft was actually quite good, but which also triggered a feeling that not enough was going on.

There's a lot to like here, though - Anahita Ghazvinizadeh's look at a 14-year-old girl (Florence Galimberti) about to have her ears pierced only to have even something simple like that disrupted by the ugly divorce her parents are going through is immensely well-observed. Galimberti is great, and Moe Beitiks makes the mother quite human even if she is all germophobia and egotism. For most of the short, the impression is definitely that this is what it's like.

But there's also about five or six minutes that feel like padding, or rambling on after a point has been made, and while a feature can absorb that, a 21-minute feature that's all about observation as-is really can't; it makes the movie feel even more static and uneventful. It doesn't overshadow the good stuff, but it is an issue.

"Refuge"

* * * ½ (out of four)
Seen 12 November 2013 at the Regent Theatre (Gathr Previews Presents New Faces of Independent Film, digital)

This one was my favorite of the group, an episode of Futurestates (a PBS anthology series) featuring Nikohl Boosheri as a Persian immigrant facing deportation after an Iranian virus cripples an American government computer network who may be given a chance to stay in the country if she will carry a child for a biotech firm.

It's good science fiction built on some rather current events, with strong attention to detail, both visually and in terms of how everything that happens seems like a very reasonable extrapolation from the present day. Writer/director Mohammad Gorjestani doesn't just come up with little bits that seem right, though; he's strapped them to a story that is the right size for this short and finishes on just the right shot.

Plus, Boosheri is pretty good. She seems just flustered enough as an immigrant who is finding herself trapped in a bureaucratic mess; it would have been rather easy to either overplay it or give the story too little. She's just right, even when the temptation to make the piece hers might have been very strong.

"Surveyor"

* * ¾ (out of four)
Seen 12 November 2013 at the Regent Theatre (Gathr Previews Presents New Faces of Independent Film, digital)

"Surveyor" was the other one in the package that could perhaps have done with a little more happening. It's a beautiful film, following the title character as he helps to map the American West in the 19th Century, eventually crossing the path of several unusual (and often dangerous) people.

It's beautiful, but often seems to be trying to hard. The opening minutes take great pains notto show the surveyor's face or have him speak, but when he does start to talk and appear on screen clearly, there's no particular import to the change, and by association there was no reason to have done it before, other than to make it look like something telling was going on. There's also the sound of bees in the background, persistently. Eventually, stuff starts happening, but it doesn't exactly resolve into a story.

The Counselor

* * ¼ (out of four)
Seen 15 November 2013 at AMC Boston Common #19 (first-run, 4K DCP)

Speaking of gimmicks that take more effort than they're worth, there's not giving Michael Fassbender's title character in The Counselor a name. It's something that could come across as very clever when one realizes what's been going on at the end, but you can see director Ridley Scott and writer Cormac McCarthy tiptoeing around it. There are also two or three sequences in the beginning that are quite self-conscious in terms of foreshadowing or being more than just what's happening.

That would be okay if there was a bit more to the story, but the criminal activity this counselor is involved in isn't terribly interesting. There's some drugs being smuggled, and then intercepted, but as a crime story, it lacks the intrigue that one may hope for. It's got a heck of a femme fatale in Cameron Diaz, a better-than-serviceable lead in Fassbender, and memorable performances by Javier Bardem, Brad Pitt, and Rosie Perez (Penelope Cruz is good enough, but is given little to do).

It stretches a little long at the end, too, an unusually long wind-down for this sort of movie. It's a crime movie without an interesting crime, and it has all the traits of film noir, but without the solid genre story underneath, and noir movies need that foundation. Otherwise, it's just style, and this really needs more.

Thor: The Dark World

* * ¼ (out of four)
Seen 15 November 2013 at Showcase SuperLux #3 (first-run, RealD 3D 4K DCP)

Just saw it last week; haven't changed my mind.


About Time
New Faces of Independent Film
The Counselor
The Wicker Man
The Best Man Holiday
Thor: The Dark World